YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effect of Field Drainage on Seismic Pore Pressure Buildup and Kσ under High Overburden Pressure

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 009::page 04021088-1
    Author:
    M. Ni
    ,
    T. Abdoun
    ,
    R. Dobry
    ,
    W. El-Sekelly
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002536
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This paper studies the effect of a high effective overburden pressure [σv0′= ∼600 kPa (6 atm)] under two drainage conditions on the field liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of eight centrifuge experiments with relative densities Dr=45% and 80% and base shaking are considered that include a 5-m saturated sand layer under a pressure of either σv0′= ∼100 kPa (1 atm) or ∼600 kPa (6 atm). Four of the tests had single drainage at the top of the layer (SD), whereas the other four tests had double drainage (DD) at top and bottom. The four SD test results had been reported before, whereas the four DD tests are new. A novel centrifuge technique was developed to achieve the double-drainage boundary condition of two pervious boundaries at the top and bottom of the sand layer, using a geocomposite at the bottom. Measured responses are compared at the same σv0′ between SD and DD tests having the same input acceleration, as well as between SD and DD tests where the shaking induced a similar maximum excess pore pressure ratio (ru)max≈0.8. These comparisons include acceleration time histories, excess pore pressure time histories and profiles during and after shaking, and stress ratio and shear strain time histories. Comparisons between corresponding tests at ∼100 and ∼600 kPa (1 and 6 atm) revealed significantly more partial drainage at ∼600 kPa (6 atm) than at ∼100 kPa (1 atm), with even more significant variation in excess pore pressures in the DD than in the SD tests. Best estimates of field overburden pressure correction factors at ∼600 kPa (6 atm), Kσ were obtained, were obtained from the centrifuge results with two independent methods for a failure criterion of (ru)max=0.8. Those Kσ=1.2–1.3>1.0 for both SD and DD drainage conditions due to the significantly lower compressibility of the sand at ∼600 kPa (6 atm). The results further emphasize the important role partial drainage may play in the field during shaking at high σv0′ on the excess pore pressures and values of Kσ.
    • Download: (5.448Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effect of Field Drainage on Seismic Pore Pressure Buildup and Kσ under High Overburden Pressure

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272275
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. Ni
    contributor authorT. Abdoun
    contributor authorR. Dobry
    contributor authorW. El-Sekelly
    date accessioned2022-02-01T21:54:47Z
    date available2022-02-01T21:54:47Z
    date issued9/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002536.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272275
    description abstractThis paper studies the effect of a high effective overburden pressure [σv0′= ∼600 kPa (6 atm)] under two drainage conditions on the field liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of eight centrifuge experiments with relative densities Dr=45% and 80% and base shaking are considered that include a 5-m saturated sand layer under a pressure of either σv0′= ∼100 kPa (1 atm) or ∼600 kPa (6 atm). Four of the tests had single drainage at the top of the layer (SD), whereas the other four tests had double drainage (DD) at top and bottom. The four SD test results had been reported before, whereas the four DD tests are new. A novel centrifuge technique was developed to achieve the double-drainage boundary condition of two pervious boundaries at the top and bottom of the sand layer, using a geocomposite at the bottom. Measured responses are compared at the same σv0′ between SD and DD tests having the same input acceleration, as well as between SD and DD tests where the shaking induced a similar maximum excess pore pressure ratio (ru)max≈0.8. These comparisons include acceleration time histories, excess pore pressure time histories and profiles during and after shaking, and stress ratio and shear strain time histories. Comparisons between corresponding tests at ∼100 and ∼600 kPa (1 and 6 atm) revealed significantly more partial drainage at ∼600 kPa (6 atm) than at ∼100 kPa (1 atm), with even more significant variation in excess pore pressures in the DD than in the SD tests. Best estimates of field overburden pressure correction factors at ∼600 kPa (6 atm), Kσ were obtained, were obtained from the centrifuge results with two independent methods for a failure criterion of (ru)max=0.8. Those Kσ=1.2–1.3>1.0 for both SD and DD drainage conditions due to the significantly lower compressibility of the sand at ∼600 kPa (6 atm). The results further emphasize the important role partial drainage may play in the field during shaking at high σv0′ on the excess pore pressures and values of Kσ.
    publisherASCE
    titleEffect of Field Drainage on Seismic Pore Pressure Buildup and Kσ under High Overburden Pressure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002536
    journal fristpage04021088-1
    journal lastpage04021088-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian