YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Random Forest–Based Covariate Shift in Addressing Nonstationarity of Railway Track Data

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 003::page 04021028-1
    Author:
    Ibrahim Balogun
    ,
    Nii Attoh Okine
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001141
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The multimodal transportation network in which freight rail plays an essential role continues to enhance the United States’ contributions in the global market. For years, track geometry defects data have been often gathered by visual inspections. However, automated track vehicles are now deployed for the same purpose to save time and cost. One of the limitations of an automated vehicle is the likelihood of nonstationarity of the gathered data due to external influence. The effect of nonstationarity may lead to the wrong representation of track conditions and thereby increases the possibility of false model output. This study applies supervised machine learning (ML) methods to detect the nonstationarity of the geometry data. The methods include random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machine (SVM). The authors vary the train test and validation ratio in phases to ascertain each machine learning method’s accuracy and adaptability to different distributions. In the first phase, the random forest and the support vector machine show an accuracy of 97.1%, while the logistic regression reveals 96% accuracy. In the second and third phases, the random forest method gives a better result than other supervised learners with accuracies of 97% and 97.1%, respectively. Similarly, for validation, the random forest performs better than other classifiers. Conclusively, the developed models’ application indicates that the random forest is a more effective approach to detecting the nonstationarity of track geometry data.
    • Download: (1.432Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Random Forest–Based Covariate Shift in Addressing Nonstationarity of Railway Track Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270706
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorIbrahim Balogun
    contributor authorNii Attoh Okine
    date accessioned2022-01-31T23:59:31Z
    date available2022-01-31T23:59:31Z
    date issued9/1/2021
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0001141.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270706
    description abstractThe multimodal transportation network in which freight rail plays an essential role continues to enhance the United States’ contributions in the global market. For years, track geometry defects data have been often gathered by visual inspections. However, automated track vehicles are now deployed for the same purpose to save time and cost. One of the limitations of an automated vehicle is the likelihood of nonstationarity of the gathered data due to external influence. The effect of nonstationarity may lead to the wrong representation of track conditions and thereby increases the possibility of false model output. This study applies supervised machine learning (ML) methods to detect the nonstationarity of the geometry data. The methods include random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machine (SVM). The authors vary the train test and validation ratio in phases to ascertain each machine learning method’s accuracy and adaptability to different distributions. In the first phase, the random forest and the support vector machine show an accuracy of 97.1%, while the logistic regression reveals 96% accuracy. In the second and third phases, the random forest method gives a better result than other supervised learners with accuracies of 97% and 97.1%, respectively. Similarly, for validation, the random forest performs better than other classifiers. Conclusively, the developed models’ application indicates that the random forest is a more effective approach to detecting the nonstationarity of track geometry data.
    publisherASCE
    titleRandom Forest–Based Covariate Shift in Addressing Nonstationarity of Railway Track Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue3
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0001141
    journal fristpage04021028-1
    journal lastpage04021028-8
    page8
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian