YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Laboratory and Field Measurements of Backfill Hydraulic Conductivity for a Large-Scale Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Wall

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Michael A. Malusis
    ,
    Landon C. Barlow
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002311
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Soil-bentonite (SB) cutoff walls are commonly employed to control groundwater flow and contaminant migration, and the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the SB backfill is a critical parameter in these applications. In this study, an evaluation of backfill k was conducted for a large-scale SB cutoff wall (approximately 200 m long and 7 m deep) constructed and instrumented for field research. Measurements of k (more than 150 in total) were obtained via (1) laboratory (flexible-wall and rigid-wall) tests on specimens molded from surface grab samples of the field-mixed backfill collected during construction, (2) laboratory (flexible-wall) tests on undisturbed backfill specimens prepared from Shelby tube samples taken from the wall, and (3) in situ (slug) tests conducted at 12 different locations within the wall. The laboratory tests were conducted in stages over a range of applied effective stresses (σ′=6.9, 13.8, 20.7, and 34.5 kPa) that encompassed the range of mean in situ effective stresses measured in the backfill (6–12 kPa) via embedded earth pressure and pore pressure sensors. At a given σ′, flexible-wall k values for the undisturbed specimens were similar to those for the laboratory molded specimens. However, k decreased with increasing σ′ in all of the laboratory tests, as expected, and the differences between k values measured at the lower stresses (6.9–13.8 kPa) and those measured at the higher stresses (20.7–34.8 kPa) were statistically significant. The flexible-wall tests underestimated k relative to the slug tests, but the differences generally were small (on average, within a factor of 2) when considering only the flexible-wall specimens tested at the lower applied stresses (6.9–13.8 kPa) that more closely matched the in situ stresses. The results demonstrate the importance of conducting laboratory k tests on SB backfill at stresses representative of the in situ stresses, which are limited by frictional load transfer along the sidewalls and tend to be lower than expected based on an assumed geostatic stress distribution.
    • Download: (2.579Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Laboratory and Field Measurements of Backfill Hydraulic Conductivity for a Large-Scale Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Wall

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268920
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMichael A. Malusis
    contributor authorLandon C. Barlow
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:50:05Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:50:05Z
    date issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002311.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268920
    description abstractSoil-bentonite (SB) cutoff walls are commonly employed to control groundwater flow and contaminant migration, and the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the SB backfill is a critical parameter in these applications. In this study, an evaluation of backfill k was conducted for a large-scale SB cutoff wall (approximately 200 m long and 7 m deep) constructed and instrumented for field research. Measurements of k (more than 150 in total) were obtained via (1) laboratory (flexible-wall and rigid-wall) tests on specimens molded from surface grab samples of the field-mixed backfill collected during construction, (2) laboratory (flexible-wall) tests on undisturbed backfill specimens prepared from Shelby tube samples taken from the wall, and (3) in situ (slug) tests conducted at 12 different locations within the wall. The laboratory tests were conducted in stages over a range of applied effective stresses (σ′=6.9, 13.8, 20.7, and 34.5 kPa) that encompassed the range of mean in situ effective stresses measured in the backfill (6–12 kPa) via embedded earth pressure and pore pressure sensors. At a given σ′, flexible-wall k values for the undisturbed specimens were similar to those for the laboratory molded specimens. However, k decreased with increasing σ′ in all of the laboratory tests, as expected, and the differences between k values measured at the lower stresses (6.9–13.8 kPa) and those measured at the higher stresses (20.7–34.8 kPa) were statistically significant. The flexible-wall tests underestimated k relative to the slug tests, but the differences generally were small (on average, within a factor of 2) when considering only the flexible-wall specimens tested at the lower applied stresses (6.9–13.8 kPa) that more closely matched the in situ stresses. The results demonstrate the importance of conducting laboratory k tests on SB backfill at stresses representative of the in situ stresses, which are limited by frictional load transfer along the sidewalls and tend to be lower than expected based on an assumed geostatic stress distribution.
    publisherASCE
    titleComparison of Laboratory and Field Measurements of Backfill Hydraulic Conductivity for a Large-Scale Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002311
    page13
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian