YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. II: Additional Interpretation

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    T. Abdoun
    ,
    M. Ni
    ,
    R. Dobry
    ,
    K. Zehtab
    ,
    A. Marr
    ,
    W. El-Sekelly
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002302
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This article is the second of two companion papers studying the effect of a high overburden pressure on the liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of four centrifuge experiments were conducted simulating a 5-m prototype layer of this sand in the field, having two relative densities and subjected to overburden effective pressures, σv0′, of ~100 and 600 kPa (1 and 6 atm). The layer was on a rigid impervious base and could drain freely at the top. This was supplemented by undrained stress-controlled and strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests on the same sand consolidated at 1 and 6 atm. The laboratory undrained overburden pressure factor at 6 atm obtained from the triaxial tests on loose sand, Kσ=0.85, is consistent with the state of practice (SoP), which assumes that Kσ<1.0 and Kσ decreases with σv0′. However, in the centrifuge experiments and σv0′=6  atm, the field Kσ=1.28 for loose sand and Kσ>1.15 for dense sand. The discrepancy is due to more significant partial drainage during shaking in the 6-atm centrifuge models. Although the excess pore pressures at the bottom of the sand layer seem to have been close to undrained in the four experiments, they were much smaller at shallower elevations in the 6-atm tests compared with the 1-atm tests. Further analysis is conducted by evaluation in the four centrifuge experiments of the coefficient of consolidation, cv, during the dissipation phase. This is done using the recorded pore pressure and settlement data. It is concluded that cv was two to four times greater during dissipation in the 6-atm centrifuge tests. The reason is the increase—also by a factor of two to three—of the drained constrained volumetric stiffness of the sand, M′=1/mv, when going from 1 to 6 atm. This finding plus other data from the literature suggest that for a range of sands, layer thicknesses, field conditions, earthquake shaking, and values of σv0′, both M′ and cv may increase proportionally to √σv0′, with the field Kσ>1.0, and with Kσ increasing instead of decreasing with σv0′.
    • Download: (4.509Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Pore Pressure and K&#x3c3; Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. II: Additional Interpretation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268910
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorT. Abdoun
    contributor authorM. Ni
    contributor authorR. Dobry
    contributor authorK. Zehtab
    contributor authorA. Marr
    contributor authorW. El-Sekelly
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:49:43Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:49:43Z
    date issued9/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002302.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268910
    description abstractThis article is the second of two companion papers studying the effect of a high overburden pressure on the liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of four centrifuge experiments were conducted simulating a 5-m prototype layer of this sand in the field, having two relative densities and subjected to overburden effective pressures, σv0′, of ~100 and 600 kPa (1 and 6 atm). The layer was on a rigid impervious base and could drain freely at the top. This was supplemented by undrained stress-controlled and strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests on the same sand consolidated at 1 and 6 atm. The laboratory undrained overburden pressure factor at 6 atm obtained from the triaxial tests on loose sand, Kσ=0.85, is consistent with the state of practice (SoP), which assumes that Kσ<1.0 and Kσ decreases with σv0′. However, in the centrifuge experiments and σv0′=6  atm, the field Kσ=1.28 for loose sand and Kσ>1.15 for dense sand. The discrepancy is due to more significant partial drainage during shaking in the 6-atm centrifuge models. Although the excess pore pressures at the bottom of the sand layer seem to have been close to undrained in the four experiments, they were much smaller at shallower elevations in the 6-atm tests compared with the 1-atm tests. Further analysis is conducted by evaluation in the four centrifuge experiments of the coefficient of consolidation, cv, during the dissipation phase. This is done using the recorded pore pressure and settlement data. It is concluded that cv was two to four times greater during dissipation in the 6-atm centrifuge tests. The reason is the increase—also by a factor of two to three—of the drained constrained volumetric stiffness of the sand, M′=1/mv, when going from 1 to 6 atm. This finding plus other data from the literature suggest that for a range of sands, layer thicknesses, field conditions, earthquake shaking, and values of σv0′, both M′ and cv may increase proportionally to √σv0′, with the field Kσ>1.0, and with Kσ increasing instead of decreasing with σv0′.
    publisherASCE
    titlePore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. II: Additional Interpretation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002302
    page16
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian