YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Effect of Parameter Uncertainty on Hydropower Asset Replacement Cost Models

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Stephen Signore
    ,
    Boualem Hadjerioua
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001068
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Hydropower asset managers use whole-life cost models to better manage risk costs and asset replacement strategies for their hydroelectric powertrain and balance of plant assets. Whole-life cost models can be simplified to four main input variables: Weibull scale (α) and shape (β) parameters that inform the probability of failure; a planning horizon δ, indicating the frequency of the decision-making opportunity; and a cost ratio (CR) that compares unplanned outage costs with planned outage costs. Both the probability of failure models and the cost estimates suffer from high uncertainty and a lack of information regarding confidence bounds. The sensitivity of model results to the uncertainty inherent in the CRs is highly important for informing facility and fleet-wide decision making. Weibull shape and scale parameters were modeled at ±10% errors for a wide range of CRs. This sensitivity study reveals that (1) a ±10% error in the shape parameter imparts a 0.04% to 5.89% change in the optimized annualized cost (OC) over the range of CRs; (2) at CRs above 1.4, the 4-year (±10%) error in the scale parameter causes a change in optimal point (OP) of replacement of 2 to 4 years; and (3) as CRs increase, the impact of errors on OP first measured as 7 years decreases to less than 1 year by the time CRs reach 2.4.
    • Download: (536.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Effect of Parameter Uncertainty on Hydropower Asset Replacement Cost Models

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267988
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStephen Signore
    contributor authorBoualem Hadjerioua
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:18:56Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:18:56Z
    date issued9/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0001068.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267988
    description abstractHydropower asset managers use whole-life cost models to better manage risk costs and asset replacement strategies for their hydroelectric powertrain and balance of plant assets. Whole-life cost models can be simplified to four main input variables: Weibull scale (α) and shape (β) parameters that inform the probability of failure; a planning horizon δ, indicating the frequency of the decision-making opportunity; and a cost ratio (CR) that compares unplanned outage costs with planned outage costs. Both the probability of failure models and the cost estimates suffer from high uncertainty and a lack of information regarding confidence bounds. The sensitivity of model results to the uncertainty inherent in the CRs is highly important for informing facility and fleet-wide decision making. Weibull shape and scale parameters were modeled at ±10% errors for a wide range of CRs. This sensitivity study reveals that (1) a ±10% error in the shape parameter imparts a 0.04% to 5.89% change in the optimized annualized cost (OC) over the range of CRs; (2) at CRs above 1.4, the 4-year (±10%) error in the scale parameter causes a change in optimal point (OP) of replacement of 2 to 4 years; and (3) as CRs increase, the impact of errors on OP first measured as 7 years decreases to less than 1 year by the time CRs reach 2.4.
    publisherASCE
    titleThe Effect of Parameter Uncertainty on Hydropower Asset Replacement Cost Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue3
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0001068
    page7
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian