YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Diego Paez
    ,
    Yves Filion
    ,
    Mario Castro-Gama
    ,
    Claudia Quintiliani
    ,
    Simone Santopietro
    ,
    Chris Sweetapple
    ,
    Fanlin Meng
    ,
    Raziyeh Farmani
    ,
    Guangtao Fu
    ,
    David Butler
    ,
    Qingzhou Zhang
    ,
    Feifei Zheng
    ,
    Kegong Diao
    ,
    Bogumil Ulanicki
    ,
    Yuan Huang
    ,
    Jochen Deuerlein
    ,
    Deni
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event.
    • Download: (1.290Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267878
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDiego Paez
    contributor authorYves Filion
    contributor authorMario Castro-Gama
    contributor authorClaudia Quintiliani
    contributor authorSimone Santopietro
    contributor authorChris Sweetapple
    contributor authorFanlin Meng
    contributor authorRaziyeh Farmani
    contributor authorGuangtao Fu
    contributor authorDavid Butler
    contributor authorQingzhou Zhang
    contributor authorFeifei Zheng
    contributor authorKegong Diao
    contributor authorBogumil Ulanicki
    contributor authorYuan Huang
    contributor authorJochen Deuerlein
    contributor authorDeni
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:15:01Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:15:01Z
    date issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001239.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267878
    description abstractThe paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event.
    publisherASCE
    titleBattle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239
    page13
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian