Show simple item record

contributor authorDiego Paez
contributor authorYves Filion
contributor authorMario Castro-Gama
contributor authorClaudia Quintiliani
contributor authorSimone Santopietro
contributor authorChris Sweetapple
contributor authorFanlin Meng
contributor authorRaziyeh Farmani
contributor authorGuangtao Fu
contributor authorDavid Butler
contributor authorQingzhou Zhang
contributor authorFeifei Zheng
contributor authorKegong Diao
contributor authorBogumil Ulanicki
contributor authorYuan Huang
contributor authorJochen Deuerlein
contributor authorDeni
date accessioned2022-01-30T21:15:01Z
date available2022-01-30T21:15:01Z
date issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001239.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267878
description abstractThe paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event.
publisherASCE
titleBattle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239
page13
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record