YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Experimental Studies and Modeling of High-Sulfate Soil Stabilization

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Nagasreenivasu Talluri
    ,
    Anand J. Puppala
    ,
    Surya S. C. Congress
    ,
    Aritra Banerjee
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002240
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: An experimental study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of lime stabilization with precompaction mellowing in stabilizing six different high-sulfate soils. Three mellowing times, 0, 3, and 7 days were studied. A test suite comprising engineering and chemical tests was performed on untreated and lime-treated high-sulfate soils. Four of the six soils considered in the research study responded positively to the lime stabilization with a precompaction mellowing period. Two soils with soluble sulfate levels exceeding 30,000 ppm were not successfully stabilized with the precompaction mellowing, resulting in the chemical treatments, and higher swell strain magnitudes. Two swell prediction methodologies were developed, one based on sulfate content consumed other based on compaction void ratio of the treated soils. Both methods rely on stoichiometric principles with mass-volume relationships of chemical reactions. Swell strains predicted by both methods were analyzed and compared with measured swell strains of all soils at different mellowing periods. Results showed that the sulfate content–based method predictions were not in agreement with the measured data, whereas the void ratio–based method provided better swell strain predictions. Better prediction by this method was attributed to accounting for ettringite crystal growth inside the void space of the treated soils. Potential implementation of this method to screen chemical treatments of high-sulfate soils for effective stabilization was described.
    • Download: (1.713Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Experimental Studies and Modeling of High-Sulfate Soil Stabilization

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265789
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNagasreenivasu Talluri
    contributor authorAnand J. Puppala
    contributor authorSurya S. C. Congress
    contributor authorAritra Banerjee
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:41:06Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:41:06Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002240.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265789
    description abstractAn experimental study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of lime stabilization with precompaction mellowing in stabilizing six different high-sulfate soils. Three mellowing times, 0, 3, and 7 days were studied. A test suite comprising engineering and chemical tests was performed on untreated and lime-treated high-sulfate soils. Four of the six soils considered in the research study responded positively to the lime stabilization with a precompaction mellowing period. Two soils with soluble sulfate levels exceeding 30,000 ppm were not successfully stabilized with the precompaction mellowing, resulting in the chemical treatments, and higher swell strain magnitudes. Two swell prediction methodologies were developed, one based on sulfate content consumed other based on compaction void ratio of the treated soils. Both methods rely on stoichiometric principles with mass-volume relationships of chemical reactions. Swell strains predicted by both methods were analyzed and compared with measured swell strains of all soils at different mellowing periods. Results showed that the sulfate content–based method predictions were not in agreement with the measured data, whereas the void ratio–based method provided better swell strain predictions. Better prediction by this method was attributed to accounting for ettringite crystal growth inside the void space of the treated soils. Potential implementation of this method to screen chemical treatments of high-sulfate soils for effective stabilization was described.
    publisherASCE
    titleExperimental Studies and Modeling of High-Sulfate Soil Stabilization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002240
    page04020019
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian