YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Initial Direction and Subsequent Rotation of Principal Stresses on Liquefaction Potential of Loose Sand

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    R. Prasanna
    ,
    N. Sinthujan
    ,
    S. Sivathayalan
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002182
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The effects of the initial orientation of principal stress axes and subsequent rotation of principal stresses on liquefaction susceptibility of sands were investigated. Monotonic and cyclic hollow cylinder torsional shear tests were carried out on Fraser River sand specimens consolidated to different initial principal stress orientations and subjected to principal stress rotation during loading. Cyclic loading was applied with constant amplitude cyclic deviator stress, but along stress paths that impose different magnitudes of principal stress rotation. Test results demonstrate that the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) is influenced by both the initial orientation of principal stresses and the magnitude of stress rotation during dynamic loading. These results suggest that the degree of stress rotation influences CRR more significantly than the initial principal stress orientation. Yet, the effects of the degree of stress rotation are not considered in current liquefaction assessment practice. The only available mechanism to account for principal stress directions is the use of the Kα factor, which focuses on the initial principal stress orientation only. Irrespective of the initial inclination of the major principal stress axis, the weakest cyclic resistance was noted in tests with a principal stress rotation of ±45°. The increased susceptibility to liquefaction is possibly due to factors such as the inclination of the plane of maximum shear stress with the bedding plane, inclination of major principal stress with the bedding plane, the presence of horizontal shear stress, and the nature of the variation of shear stress on the weak bedding plane.
    • Download: (2.284Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Initial Direction and Subsequent Rotation of Principal Stresses on Liquefaction Potential of Loose Sand

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265749
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorR. Prasanna
    contributor authorN. Sinthujan
    contributor authorS. Sivathayalan
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:39:54Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:39:54Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002182.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265749
    description abstractThe effects of the initial orientation of principal stress axes and subsequent rotation of principal stresses on liquefaction susceptibility of sands were investigated. Monotonic and cyclic hollow cylinder torsional shear tests were carried out on Fraser River sand specimens consolidated to different initial principal stress orientations and subjected to principal stress rotation during loading. Cyclic loading was applied with constant amplitude cyclic deviator stress, but along stress paths that impose different magnitudes of principal stress rotation. Test results demonstrate that the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) is influenced by both the initial orientation of principal stresses and the magnitude of stress rotation during dynamic loading. These results suggest that the degree of stress rotation influences CRR more significantly than the initial principal stress orientation. Yet, the effects of the degree of stress rotation are not considered in current liquefaction assessment practice. The only available mechanism to account for principal stress directions is the use of the Kα factor, which focuses on the initial principal stress orientation only. Irrespective of the initial inclination of the major principal stress axis, the weakest cyclic resistance was noted in tests with a principal stress rotation of ±45°. The increased susceptibility to liquefaction is possibly due to factors such as the inclination of the plane of maximum shear stress with the bedding plane, inclination of major principal stress with the bedding plane, the presence of horizontal shear stress, and the nature of the variation of shear stress on the weak bedding plane.
    publisherASCE
    titleEffects of Initial Direction and Subsequent Rotation of Principal Stresses on Liquefaction Potential of Loose Sand
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002182
    page04019130
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian