Sensitivity Analysis of the WRF Model: Wind-Resource Assessment for Complex TerrainSource: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2017:;volume 057:;issue 003::page 733Author:Fernández-González, Sergio
,
Martín, María Luisa
,
García-Ortega, Eduardo
,
Merino, Andrés
,
Lorenzana, Jesús
,
Sánchez, José Luis
,
Valero, Francisco
,
Rodrigo, Javier Sanz
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0121.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: AbstractWind energy requires accurate forecasts for adequate integration into the electric grid system. In addition, global atmospheric models are not able to simulate local winds in complex terrain, where wind farms are sometimes placed. For this reason, the use of mesoscale models is vital for estimating wind speed at wind turbine hub height. In this regard, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model allows a user to apply different initial and boundary conditions as well as physical parameterizations. In this research, a sensitivity analysis of several physical schemes and initial and boundary conditions was performed for the Alaiz mountain range in the northern Iberian Peninsula, where several wind farms are located. Model performance was evaluated under various atmospheric stabilities and wind speeds. For validation purposes, a mast with anemometers installed at 40, 78, 90, and 118 m above ground level was used. The results indicate that performance of the Global Forecast System analysis and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) as initial and boundary conditions was similar, although each performed better under certain meteorological conditions. With regard to physical schemes, there is no single combination of parameterizations that performs best during all weather conditions. Nevertheless, some combinations have been identified as inefficient, and therefore their use is discouraged. As a result, the validation of an ensemble prediction system composed of the best 12 deterministic simulations shows the most accurate results, obtaining relative errors in wind speed forecasts that are <15%.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Fernández-González, Sergio | |
contributor author | Martín, María Luisa | |
contributor author | García-Ortega, Eduardo | |
contributor author | Merino, Andrés | |
contributor author | Lorenzana, Jesús | |
contributor author | Sánchez, José Luis | |
contributor author | Valero, Francisco | |
contributor author | Rodrigo, Javier Sanz | |
date accessioned | 2019-09-19T10:06:19Z | |
date available | 2019-09-19T10:06:19Z | |
date copyright | 11/29/2017 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2017 | |
identifier other | jamc-d-17-0121.1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261581 | |
description abstract | AbstractWind energy requires accurate forecasts for adequate integration into the electric grid system. In addition, global atmospheric models are not able to simulate local winds in complex terrain, where wind farms are sometimes placed. For this reason, the use of mesoscale models is vital for estimating wind speed at wind turbine hub height. In this regard, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model allows a user to apply different initial and boundary conditions as well as physical parameterizations. In this research, a sensitivity analysis of several physical schemes and initial and boundary conditions was performed for the Alaiz mountain range in the northern Iberian Peninsula, where several wind farms are located. Model performance was evaluated under various atmospheric stabilities and wind speeds. For validation purposes, a mast with anemometers installed at 40, 78, 90, and 118 m above ground level was used. The results indicate that performance of the Global Forecast System analysis and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) as initial and boundary conditions was similar, although each performed better under certain meteorological conditions. With regard to physical schemes, there is no single combination of parameterizations that performs best during all weather conditions. Nevertheless, some combinations have been identified as inefficient, and therefore their use is discouraged. As a result, the validation of an ensemble prediction system composed of the best 12 deterministic simulations shows the most accurate results, obtaining relative errors in wind speed forecasts that are <15%. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Sensitivity Analysis of the WRF Model: Wind-Resource Assessment for Complex Terrain | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 57 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0121.1 | |
journal fristpage | 733 | |
journal lastpage | 753 | |
tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2017:;volume 057:;issue 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |