YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Stress-Dependent Methods for the Punch-Through Capacity of Foundations in Clay with Sand

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Chong Tang
    ,
    Kok-Kwang Phoon
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001016
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper compiled 159 centrifuge tests for foundations in clay with interbedded sand where punch-through failure was observed. The accuracy of initial- and failure-stress-dependent methods was quantified by the mean and coefficient of variation (COV) of a model factor defined as the ratio between the measured and calculated punch-through capacity. When the friction angle is reduced with consideration of the effect of sand dilation, both the initial- and failure-stress-dependent methods can accurately estimate the punch-through capacity of foundations in clay with sand. Numerical analyses were performed to verify the observation. The mean of the model factor is close to 1, and the COV is smaller than 0.3. For multilayer clays interbedded by carbonate sand, they could significantly overestimate the punch-through capacity. This is because carbonate sand has considerably higher compressibility, which is not incorporated into the initial- and failure-stress-dependent methods.
    • Download: (774.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Stress-Dependent Methods for the Punch-Through Capacity of Foundations in Clay with Sand

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260262
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChong Tang
    contributor authorKok-Kwang Phoon
    date accessioned2019-09-18T10:41:09Z
    date available2019-09-18T10:41:09Z
    date issued2019
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0001016.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260262
    description abstractThis paper compiled 159 centrifuge tests for foundations in clay with interbedded sand where punch-through failure was observed. The accuracy of initial- and failure-stress-dependent methods was quantified by the mean and coefficient of variation (COV) of a model factor defined as the ratio between the measured and calculated punch-through capacity. When the friction angle is reduced with consideration of the effect of sand dilation, both the initial- and failure-stress-dependent methods can accurately estimate the punch-through capacity of foundations in clay with sand. Numerical analyses were performed to verify the observation. The mean of the model factor is close to 1, and the COV is smaller than 0.3. For multilayer clays interbedded by carbonate sand, they could significantly overestimate the punch-through capacity. This is because carbonate sand has considerably higher compressibility, which is not incorporated into the initial- and failure-stress-dependent methods.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation of Stress-Dependent Methods for the Punch-Through Capacity of Foundations in Clay with Sand
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue3
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0001016
    page04019008
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian