Show simple item record

contributor authorAbbasi-Atibeh, Ehsan
contributor authorJella, Sandeep
contributor authorBergthorson, Jeffrey M.
date accessioned2019-03-17T10:41:01Z
date available2019-03-17T10:41:01Z
date copyright10/29/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2019
identifier issn0742-4795
identifier othergtp_141_03_031024.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256261
description abstractSensitivity to stretch and differential diffusion of chemical species are known to influence premixed flame propagation, even in the turbulent environment where mass diffusion can be greatly enhanced. In this context, it is convenient to characterize flames by their Lewis number (Le), a ratio of thermal-to-mass diffusion. The work reported in this paper describes a study of flame stabilization characteristics when Le is varied. The test data are comprised of Le≪1 (hydrogen), Le≈1 (methane), and Le>1 (propane) flames stabilized at various turbulence levels. The experiments were carried out in a hot exhaust opposed-flow turbulent flame rig (HOTFR), which consists of two axially opposed, symmetric jets. The stagnation plane between the two jets allows the aerodynamic stabilization of a flame and clearly identifies fuel influences on turbulent flames. Furthermore, high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV), using oil droplet seeding, allowed simultaneous recordings of velocity (mean and rms) and flame surface position. These experiments, along with data processing tools developed through this study, illustrated that in the mixtures with Le≪1, turbulent flame speed increases considerably compared to the laminar flame speed due to differential diffusion effects, where higher burning rates compensate for the steepening average velocity gradient and keeps these flames almost stationary as bulk flow velocity increases. These experiments are suitable for validating the ability of turbulent combustion models to predict lifted, aerodynamically stabilized flames. In the final part of this paper, we model the three fuels at two turbulence intensities using the flamelet generated manifolds (FGM) model in a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) context. Computations reveal that the qualitative flame stabilization trends reproduce the effects of turbulence intensity; however, more accurate predictions are required to capture the influences of fuel variations and differential diffusion.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleFuel Variation Effects in Propagation and Stabilization of Turbulent Counter-Flow Premixed Flames
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4041136
journal fristpage31024
journal lastpage031024-10
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record