Show simple item record

contributor authorFang, Zheng
contributor authorZhang, Bing
contributor authorMoser, Michael
contributor authorZhang, Edwin
contributor authorZhang, Wenjun
date accessioned2019-03-17T09:49:53Z
date available2019-03-17T09:49:53Z
date copyright10/19/2017 12:00:00 AM
date issued2019
identifier issn2572-7958
identifier otherjesmdt_001_01_011001.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255708
description abstractThe aim of the study was to design a novel radiofrequency (RF) electrode for larger and rounder ablation volumes and its ability to achieve the complete ablation of liver tumors larger than 3 cm in diameter using finite element method. A new RF expandable electrode comprising three parts (i.e., insulated shaft, changing shaft, and hooks) was designed. Two modes of this new electrode, such as monopolar expandable electrode (MEE) and hybrid expandable electrode (HEE), and a commercial expandable electrode (CEE) were investigated using liver tissue with (scenario I) and without (scenario II) a liver tumor. A temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) protocol with a target temperature of 95 °C and an ablation time of 15 min was used in the study. Both the volume and shape of the ablation zone were examined for all RF electrodes in scenario I. Then, the RF electrode with the best performance in scenario I and CEE were used to ablate a large liver tumor with the diameter of 3.5 cm (scenario II) to evaluate the effectiveness of complete tumor ablation of the designed RF electrode. In scenario I, the ablation volumes of CEE, HEE, and MEE were 12.11 cm3, 33.29 cm3, and 48.75 cm3, respectively. The values of sphericity index (SI) of CEE, HEE, and MEE were 0.457, 0.957, and 0.976, respectively. The best performance was achieved by using MEE. In scenario II, the ablation volumes of MEE and CEE were 71.59 cm3 and 19.53 cm3, respectively. Also, a rounder ablation volume was achieved by using MEE compared to CEE (SI: 0.978 versus 0.596). The study concluded that: (1) compared with CEE, both MEE and HEE get larger and rounder ablation volumes due to the larger electrode–tissue interface and rounder shape of hook deployment; (2) MEE has the best performance in getting a larger and rounder ablation volume; and (3) computer simulation result shows that MEE is also able to ablate a large liver tumor (i.e., 3.5 cm in diameter) completely, which has at least 0.785 cm safety margin.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDesign of a Novel Electrode of Radiofrequency Ablation for Large Tumors: A Finite Element Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
identifier doi10.1115/1.4038129
journal fristpage11001
journal lastpage011001-6
treeJournal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy:;2019:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record