Turbulent Flow Through a Ducted Elbow and Plugged Tee Geometry: An Experimental and Numerical StudySource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 008::page 81101Author:Bluestein, Andrew M.
,
Venters, Ravon
,
Bohl, Douglas
,
Helenbrook, Brian T.
,
Ahmadi, Goodarz
DOI: 10.1115/1.4042256Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: An experimental and computational comparison of the turbulent flow field for a sharp 90 deg elbow and plugged tee junction is presented. These are commonly used industrial geometries with the tee often retrofitted by plugging the straight exit to create an elbow. Mean and fluctuating velocities along the midplane were measured via two-dimensional (2D) particle image velocimetry (PIV), and the results were compared with the predictions of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations for Reynolds numbers of 11,500 and 115,000. Major flow features of the elbow and plugged tee were compared using the mean velocity contours. Geometry effects and Reynolds number effects were studied by examining the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) fluctuating velocity profiles at six positions. Finally, the asymmetry of the flow as measured by the position of the centroid of the volumetric flux and pressure loss data were examined to quantify the streamwise evolution of the flow in the respective geometries. It was found that in both geometries there was a large recirculation zone in the downstream leg but the RANS simulations predicted an overly long recirculation which led to significantly different mean and fluctuating velocities in that region when compared to the experiments. Comparison of velocity profiles showed that both experiments and numerics agree in the fact that the turbulence intensities were greater at higher Re downstream of the vertical leg. Finally, it was shown that the plugged tee recovered its symmetry more rapidly and created less pressure loss than the elbow.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Bluestein, Andrew M. | |
contributor author | Venters, Ravon | |
contributor author | Bohl, Douglas | |
contributor author | Helenbrook, Brian T. | |
contributor author | Ahmadi, Goodarz | |
date accessioned | 2019-03-17T09:48:00Z | |
date available | 2019-03-17T09:48:00Z | |
date copyright | 1/30/2019 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2019 | |
identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
identifier other | fe_141_08_081101.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255689 | |
description abstract | An experimental and computational comparison of the turbulent flow field for a sharp 90 deg elbow and plugged tee junction is presented. These are commonly used industrial geometries with the tee often retrofitted by plugging the straight exit to create an elbow. Mean and fluctuating velocities along the midplane were measured via two-dimensional (2D) particle image velocimetry (PIV), and the results were compared with the predictions of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations for Reynolds numbers of 11,500 and 115,000. Major flow features of the elbow and plugged tee were compared using the mean velocity contours. Geometry effects and Reynolds number effects were studied by examining the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) fluctuating velocity profiles at six positions. Finally, the asymmetry of the flow as measured by the position of the centroid of the volumetric flux and pressure loss data were examined to quantify the streamwise evolution of the flow in the respective geometries. It was found that in both geometries there was a large recirculation zone in the downstream leg but the RANS simulations predicted an overly long recirculation which led to significantly different mean and fluctuating velocities in that region when compared to the experiments. Comparison of velocity profiles showed that both experiments and numerics agree in the fact that the turbulence intensities were greater at higher Re downstream of the vertical leg. Finally, it was shown that the plugged tee recovered its symmetry more rapidly and created less pressure loss than the elbow. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Turbulent Flow Through a Ducted Elbow and Plugged Tee Geometry: An Experimental and Numerical Study | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 141 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4042256 | |
journal fristpage | 81101 | |
journal lastpage | 081101-14 | |
tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |