YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessing Resilience Model Responsiveness in the Context of Stakeholder Preferences in Decision Support Systems

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Roy Emanuel; Bilal Ayyub
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001002
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: From Presidential Policy Directive 21, professional societies’ national meetings, to major United Nations initiatives, resilience has captured the attention of powerful stakeholders. Resilience models focus on system performance and threats to the system. Few models consider the preferences of the stakeholders of the systems. This course of study investigates the effect of incorporating stakeholder preferences into four existing resilience models: Resilience Factor, Quotient Resilience, Total Quotient Resilience, and Integral Resilience. The preferences of interest are stakeholder time horizon, endogenous performance preference, and intertemporal substitutability of system performance. The resultant eight illustrative models are comparatively examined for sensitivity to changes in system performance and stakeholder preferences using four fundamental system performance and stakeholder preference models. A city infrastructure system dynamics simulation serves as a case study for the eight resilience models. The resilience models rank the preferred courses of action for improving the infrastructure system. The study concludes that the Extended Integral Resilience model most effectively differentiates among the alternative courses of action.
    • Download: (1.303Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Assessing Resilience Model Responsiveness in the Context of Stakeholder Preferences in Decision Support Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254430
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRoy Emanuel; Bilal Ayyub
    date accessioned2019-03-10T11:52:41Z
    date available2019-03-10T11:52:41Z
    date issued2019
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0001002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254430
    description abstractFrom Presidential Policy Directive 21, professional societies’ national meetings, to major United Nations initiatives, resilience has captured the attention of powerful stakeholders. Resilience models focus on system performance and threats to the system. Few models consider the preferences of the stakeholders of the systems. This course of study investigates the effect of incorporating stakeholder preferences into four existing resilience models: Resilience Factor, Quotient Resilience, Total Quotient Resilience, and Integral Resilience. The preferences of interest are stakeholder time horizon, endogenous performance preference, and intertemporal substitutability of system performance. The resultant eight illustrative models are comparatively examined for sensitivity to changes in system performance and stakeholder preferences using four fundamental system performance and stakeholder preference models. A city infrastructure system dynamics simulation serves as a case study for the eight resilience models. The resilience models rank the preferred courses of action for improving the infrastructure system. The study concludes that the Extended Integral Resilience model most effectively differentiates among the alternative courses of action.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAssessing Resilience Model Responsiveness in the Context of Stakeholder Preferences in Decision Support Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue2
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0001002
    page04019005
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian