Assessing Resilience Model Responsiveness in the Context of Stakeholder Preferences in Decision Support SystemsSource: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002Author:Roy Emanuel; Bilal Ayyub
DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001002Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: From Presidential Policy Directive 21, professional societies’ national meetings, to major United Nations initiatives, resilience has captured the attention of powerful stakeholders. Resilience models focus on system performance and threats to the system. Few models consider the preferences of the stakeholders of the systems. This course of study investigates the effect of incorporating stakeholder preferences into four existing resilience models: Resilience Factor, Quotient Resilience, Total Quotient Resilience, and Integral Resilience. The preferences of interest are stakeholder time horizon, endogenous performance preference, and intertemporal substitutability of system performance. The resultant eight illustrative models are comparatively examined for sensitivity to changes in system performance and stakeholder preferences using four fundamental system performance and stakeholder preference models. A city infrastructure system dynamics simulation serves as a case study for the eight resilience models. The resilience models rank the preferred courses of action for improving the infrastructure system. The study concludes that the Extended Integral Resilience model most effectively differentiates among the alternative courses of action.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Roy Emanuel; Bilal Ayyub | |
date accessioned | 2019-03-10T11:52:41Z | |
date available | 2019-03-10T11:52:41Z | |
date issued | 2019 | |
identifier other | AJRUA6.0001002.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254430 | |
description abstract | From Presidential Policy Directive 21, professional societies’ national meetings, to major United Nations initiatives, resilience has captured the attention of powerful stakeholders. Resilience models focus on system performance and threats to the system. Few models consider the preferences of the stakeholders of the systems. This course of study investigates the effect of incorporating stakeholder preferences into four existing resilience models: Resilience Factor, Quotient Resilience, Total Quotient Resilience, and Integral Resilience. The preferences of interest are stakeholder time horizon, endogenous performance preference, and intertemporal substitutability of system performance. The resultant eight illustrative models are comparatively examined for sensitivity to changes in system performance and stakeholder preferences using four fundamental system performance and stakeholder preference models. A city infrastructure system dynamics simulation serves as a case study for the eight resilience models. The resilience models rank the preferred courses of action for improving the infrastructure system. The study concludes that the Extended Integral Resilience model most effectively differentiates among the alternative courses of action. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Assessing Resilience Model Responsiveness in the Context of Stakeholder Preferences in Decision Support Systems | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 5 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001002 | |
page | 04019005 | |
tree | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |