YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Felt-Type and Paper-Type Gas Diffusion Layers for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Applications Using X-Ray Techniques

    Source: Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage:;2018:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 001::page 11002
    Author:
    Banerjee, R.
    ,
    Chevalier, S.
    ,
    Liu, H.
    ,
    Lee, J.
    ,
    Yip, R.
    ,
    Han, K.
    ,
    Hong, B. K.
    ,
    Bazylak, A.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4037766
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This work presents a comparison between carbon felt-type and paper-type gas diffusion layers (GDLs) for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells in terms of the similarities and the differences between their microstructures and the corresponding manner in which liquid water accumulated within the microstructures during operation. X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to investigate the microstructure of single-layered GDLs (without a microporous layer (MPL)) and bilayered GDLs (with an MPL). In-operando synchrotron X-ray radiography was used to visualize the GDL liquid water accumulation during fuel cell operation as a function of current density. The felt-type GDLs studied here exhibited a more uniform porosity in the core regions, and the carbon fibers in the substrate were more prone to MPL intrusion. More liquid water accumulated in the felt-type GDLs during fuel cell operation; however, when differentiating between the microstructural impact of felt and paper GDLs, the presence of an MPL in bilayered GDLs was the most influential factor in liquid water management.
    • Download: (2.283Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Felt-Type and Paper-Type Gas Diffusion Layers for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Applications Using X-Ray Techniques

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254093
    Collections
    • Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBanerjee, R.
    contributor authorChevalier, S.
    contributor authorLiu, H.
    contributor authorLee, J.
    contributor authorYip, R.
    contributor authorHan, K.
    contributor authorHong, B. K.
    contributor authorBazylak, A.
    date accessioned2019-02-28T11:13:53Z
    date available2019-02-28T11:13:53Z
    date copyright10/4/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn2381-6872
    identifier otherjeecs_015_01_011002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254093
    description abstractThis work presents a comparison between carbon felt-type and paper-type gas diffusion layers (GDLs) for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells in terms of the similarities and the differences between their microstructures and the corresponding manner in which liquid water accumulated within the microstructures during operation. X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to investigate the microstructure of single-layered GDLs (without a microporous layer (MPL)) and bilayered GDLs (with an MPL). In-operando synchrotron X-ray radiography was used to visualize the GDL liquid water accumulation during fuel cell operation as a function of current density. The felt-type GDLs studied here exhibited a more uniform porosity in the core regions, and the carbon fibers in the substrate were more prone to MPL intrusion. More liquid water accumulated in the felt-type GDLs during fuel cell operation; however, when differentiating between the microstructural impact of felt and paper GDLs, the presence of an MPL in bilayered GDLs was the most influential factor in liquid water management.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Felt-Type and Paper-Type Gas Diffusion Layers for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Applications Using X-Ray Techniques
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4037766
    journal fristpage11002
    journal lastpage011002-10
    treeJournal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage:;2018:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian