YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Operator Bias Errors Are Reduced Using Standing Marker Alignment Device for Repeated Visit Studies

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 004::page 41001
    Author:
    Hutchinson, Laura
    ,
    Schwartz, Joel B.
    ,
    Morton, Amy M.
    ,
    Davis, Irene S.
    ,
    Deluzio, Kevin J.
    ,
    Rainbow, Michael J.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4038358
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: When optical motion capture is used for motion analysis, reflective markers or a digitizer are typically used to record the location of anatomical landmarks identified through palpation. The landmarks are then used to construct anatomical coordinate systems. Failure to consistently identify landmarks through palpation over repeat tests creates artifacts in the kinematic waveforms. The purpose of this work was to improve intra- and inter-rater reliability in determining lower limb anatomical landmarks and the associated anatomical coordinate systems using a marker alignment device (MAD). The device aids the subject in recreating the same standing posture over multiple tests, and recreates the anatomical landmarks from previous static calibration trials. We tested three different raters who identified landmarks on eleven subjects. The subjects performed walking trials and their gait kinematics were analyzed with and without the device. Ankle kinematics were not improved by the device suggesting manual palpation over repeat visits is just as effective as the MAD. Intra-class correlation coefficients between gait kinematics registered to the reference static trial and registered to follow-up static trials with and without the device were improved between 1% and 33% when the device was used. Importantly, out-of-plane hip and knee kinematics showed the greatest improvements in repeatability. These results suggest that the device is well suited to reducing palpation artifact during repeat visits to the gait lab.
    • Download: (821.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Operator Bias Errors Are Reduced Using Standing Marker Alignment Device for Repeated Visit Studies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253541
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHutchinson, Laura
    contributor authorSchwartz, Joel B.
    contributor authorMorton, Amy M.
    contributor authorDavis, Irene S.
    contributor authorDeluzio, Kevin J.
    contributor authorRainbow, Michael J.
    date accessioned2019-02-28T11:10:53Z
    date available2019-02-28T11:10:53Z
    date copyright1/19/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_140_04_041001.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253541
    description abstractWhen optical motion capture is used for motion analysis, reflective markers or a digitizer are typically used to record the location of anatomical landmarks identified through palpation. The landmarks are then used to construct anatomical coordinate systems. Failure to consistently identify landmarks through palpation over repeat tests creates artifacts in the kinematic waveforms. The purpose of this work was to improve intra- and inter-rater reliability in determining lower limb anatomical landmarks and the associated anatomical coordinate systems using a marker alignment device (MAD). The device aids the subject in recreating the same standing posture over multiple tests, and recreates the anatomical landmarks from previous static calibration trials. We tested three different raters who identified landmarks on eleven subjects. The subjects performed walking trials and their gait kinematics were analyzed with and without the device. Ankle kinematics were not improved by the device suggesting manual palpation over repeat visits is just as effective as the MAD. Intra-class correlation coefficients between gait kinematics registered to the reference static trial and registered to follow-up static trials with and without the device were improved between 1% and 33% when the device was used. Importantly, out-of-plane hip and knee kinematics showed the greatest improvements in repeatability. These results suggest that the device is well suited to reducing palpation artifact during repeat visits to the gait lab.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOperator Bias Errors Are Reduced Using Standing Marker Alignment Device for Repeated Visit Studies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4038358
    journal fristpage41001
    journal lastpage041001-7
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian