YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Free-Form Versus Ruled Inducer Design in a Transonic Centrifugal Impeller

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2018:;volume 140:;issue 001::page 11010
    Author:
    Hazby, Hamid
    ,
    Robinson, Chris
    ,
    Casey, Michael
    ,
    Rusch, Daniel
    ,
    Hunziker, Rene
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4038176
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The detailed design of the inducer of a high pressure ratio transonic radial compressor impeller with a design inlet tip relative Mach number of 1.4 is considered. Numerical analysis has been used to compare a datum impeller with ruled inducer design with a number of different free-form design concepts, generated following the same aerodynamic design philosophy. The datum stage and one with a free-form inducer, referred to as “barrelled forward swept,” with forward swept leading edge near the tip and increased chord at midspan, have been manufactured and tested. The tests were performed with the same stationary components, including the casing, vaned diffuser, and the volute. The design with a barrelled forward sweep of the inducer allows the designer more control of the strength and position of the passage shock at the inlet while meeting mechanical constraints. Interestingly, the performance is also enhanced at off-design points at lower tip-speeds. The measurements show that the stage tested with the swept impeller achieves higher efficiency of between 0.5% and 1.6% compared to the datum design, depending on the operating speed. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to further study the flow at part speeds, in order to explain the causes of the observed performance differences at off design conditions.
    • Download: (8.354Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Free-Form Versus Ruled Inducer Design in a Transonic Centrifugal Impeller

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253299
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHazby, Hamid
    contributor authorRobinson, Chris
    contributor authorCasey, Michael
    contributor authorRusch, Daniel
    contributor authorHunziker, Rene
    date accessioned2019-02-28T11:09:34Z
    date available2019-02-28T11:09:34Z
    date copyright10/31/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherturbo_140_01_011010.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253299
    description abstractThe detailed design of the inducer of a high pressure ratio transonic radial compressor impeller with a design inlet tip relative Mach number of 1.4 is considered. Numerical analysis has been used to compare a datum impeller with ruled inducer design with a number of different free-form design concepts, generated following the same aerodynamic design philosophy. The datum stage and one with a free-form inducer, referred to as “barrelled forward swept,” with forward swept leading edge near the tip and increased chord at midspan, have been manufactured and tested. The tests were performed with the same stationary components, including the casing, vaned diffuser, and the volute. The design with a barrelled forward sweep of the inducer allows the designer more control of the strength and position of the passage shock at the inlet while meeting mechanical constraints. Interestingly, the performance is also enhanced at off-design points at lower tip-speeds. The measurements show that the stage tested with the swept impeller achieves higher efficiency of between 0.5% and 1.6% compared to the datum design, depending on the operating speed. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to further study the flow at part speeds, in order to explain the causes of the observed performance differences at off design conditions.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleFree-Form Versus Ruled Inducer Design in a Transonic Centrifugal Impeller
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4038176
    journal fristpage11010
    journal lastpage011010-12
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2018:;volume 140:;issue 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian