Precautions at Fukushima That Would Have Suppressed the Accident SeveritySource: Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 003::page 31007DOI: 10.1115/1.4039343Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The Great East Japan Earthquake on Mar. 11, 2011 triggered huge tsunami waves that attacked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (Fukushima-1). Units 1, 3, and 4 had hydrogen explosions. Units 1–3 had core meltdowns and released a large amount of radioactive material. Published investigation reports did not explain how the severity of the accident could have been prevented. We formed a study group to find: (A) Was the earthquake-induced huge tsunami predictable at Fukushima-1? (B) If it was predictable, what preparations at Fukushima-1 could have avoided the severity of the accident? Our conclusions were: (a) The tsunami that hit Fukushima-1 was predictable, and (b) the severity could have been avoided if the plant had prepared a set of equipment, and most of all, had exercised actions to take against such tsunami. Necessary preparation included: (1) a number of direct current (DC) batteries, (2) portable underwater pumps, (3) portable alternating current (AC) generators with sufficient gasoline supply, (4) high voltage AC power trucks, and (5) drills against extended loss of all electric power and seawater pumps. This set applied only to this specific accident. A thorough preparation would have added (6) portable compressors, (7) watertight modification to reactor core isolation cooling system (RCIC) and high pressure coolant injection system (HPCI) control and instrumentation, and (8) fire engines for alternate low pressure water injection. Item (5), i.e., to study plans and carry out exercises against the tsunami would have identified all other necessary preparations.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Iino, Kenji | |
contributor author | Yoshioka, Ritsuo | |
contributor author | Fuchigami, Masao | |
contributor author | Nakao, Masayuki | |
date accessioned | 2019-02-28T11:05:28Z | |
date available | 2019-02-28T11:05:28Z | |
date copyright | 5/16/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2018 | |
identifier issn | 2332-8983 | |
identifier other | ners_004_03_031007.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252571 | |
description abstract | The Great East Japan Earthquake on Mar. 11, 2011 triggered huge tsunami waves that attacked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (Fukushima-1). Units 1, 3, and 4 had hydrogen explosions. Units 1–3 had core meltdowns and released a large amount of radioactive material. Published investigation reports did not explain how the severity of the accident could have been prevented. We formed a study group to find: (A) Was the earthquake-induced huge tsunami predictable at Fukushima-1? (B) If it was predictable, what preparations at Fukushima-1 could have avoided the severity of the accident? Our conclusions were: (a) The tsunami that hit Fukushima-1 was predictable, and (b) the severity could have been avoided if the plant had prepared a set of equipment, and most of all, had exercised actions to take against such tsunami. Necessary preparation included: (1) a number of direct current (DC) batteries, (2) portable underwater pumps, (3) portable alternating current (AC) generators with sufficient gasoline supply, (4) high voltage AC power trucks, and (5) drills against extended loss of all electric power and seawater pumps. This set applied only to this specific accident. A thorough preparation would have added (6) portable compressors, (7) watertight modification to reactor core isolation cooling system (RCIC) and high pressure coolant injection system (HPCI) control and instrumentation, and (8) fire engines for alternate low pressure water injection. Item (5), i.e., to study plans and carry out exercises against the tsunami would have identified all other necessary preparations. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Precautions at Fukushima That Would Have Suppressed the Accident Severity | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 4 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4039343 | |
journal fristpage | 31007 | |
journal lastpage | 031007-14 | |
tree | Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |