YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Process Mapping and In-Process Monitoring of Porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Layerwise Optical Imaging

    Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 010::page 101009
    Author:
    Imani, Farhad
    ,
    Gaikwad, Aniruddha
    ,
    Montazeri, Mohammad
    ,
    Rao, Prahalada
    ,
    Yang, Hui
    ,
    Reutzel, Edward
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4040615
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The goal of this work is to understand the effect of process conditions on lack of fusion porosity in parts made using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) process, and subsequently, to detect the onset of process conditions that lead to lack of fusion-related porosity from in-process sensor data. In pursuit of this goal, the objectives of this work are twofold: (1) quantify the count (number), size and location of pores as a function of three LPBF process parameters, namely, the hatch spacing (H), laser velocity (V), and laser power (P); and (2) monitor and identify process conditions that are liable to cause porosity through analysis of in-process layer-by-layer optical images of the build invoking multifractal and spectral graph theoretic features. These objectives are important because porosity has a significant impact on the functional integrity of LPBF parts, such as fatigue life. Furthermore, linking process conditions to defects via sensor signatures is the first step toward in-process quality assurance in LPBF. To achieve the first objective, titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) test cylinders of 10 mm diameter × 25 mm height were built under differing H, V, and P settings on a commercial LPBF machine (EOS M280). The effect of these process parameters on count, size, and location of pores was quantified based on X-ray computed tomography (XCT) images. To achieve the second objective, layerwise optical images of the powder bed were acquired as the parts were being built. Spectral graph theoretic and multifractal features were extracted from the layer-by-layer images for each test part. Subsequently, these features were linked to the process parameters using machine learning approaches. Through these image-based features, process conditions under which the parts were built were identified with the statistical fidelity over 80% (F-score).
    • Download: (3.533Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Process Mapping and In-Process Monitoring of Porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Layerwise Optical Imaging

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251984
    Collections
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorImani, Farhad
    contributor authorGaikwad, Aniruddha
    contributor authorMontazeri, Mohammad
    contributor authorRao, Prahalada
    contributor authorYang, Hui
    contributor authorReutzel, Edward
    date accessioned2019-02-28T11:02:20Z
    date available2019-02-28T11:02:20Z
    date copyright7/27/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn1087-1357
    identifier othermanu_140_10_101009.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251984
    description abstractThe goal of this work is to understand the effect of process conditions on lack of fusion porosity in parts made using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) process, and subsequently, to detect the onset of process conditions that lead to lack of fusion-related porosity from in-process sensor data. In pursuit of this goal, the objectives of this work are twofold: (1) quantify the count (number), size and location of pores as a function of three LPBF process parameters, namely, the hatch spacing (H), laser velocity (V), and laser power (P); and (2) monitor and identify process conditions that are liable to cause porosity through analysis of in-process layer-by-layer optical images of the build invoking multifractal and spectral graph theoretic features. These objectives are important because porosity has a significant impact on the functional integrity of LPBF parts, such as fatigue life. Furthermore, linking process conditions to defects via sensor signatures is the first step toward in-process quality assurance in LPBF. To achieve the first objective, titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) test cylinders of 10 mm diameter × 25 mm height were built under differing H, V, and P settings on a commercial LPBF machine (EOS M280). The effect of these process parameters on count, size, and location of pores was quantified based on X-ray computed tomography (XCT) images. To achieve the second objective, layerwise optical images of the powder bed were acquired as the parts were being built. Spectral graph theoretic and multifractal features were extracted from the layer-by-layer images for each test part. Subsequently, these features were linked to the process parameters using machine learning approaches. Through these image-based features, process conditions under which the parts were built were identified with the statistical fidelity over 80% (F-score).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleProcess Mapping and In-Process Monitoring of Porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Layerwise Optical Imaging
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4040615
    journal fristpage101009
    journal lastpage101009-14
    treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian