YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Active Flow Control of Dynamic Stall by Means of Continuous Jet Flow at Reynolds Number of 1 × 106

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 001::page 11107
    Author:
    Tadjfar, Mehran
    ,
    Asgari, Ehsan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4037841
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: We have studied the influence of a tangential blowing jet in dynamic stall of a NACA0012 airfoil at Reynolds number of 1 × 106, for active flow control (AFC) purposes. The airfoil was oscillating between angles of attack (AOA) of 5 and 25 deg about its quarter-chord with a sinusoidal motion. We have utilized computational fluid dynamics to investigate the impact of jet location and jet velocity ratio on the aerodynamic coefficients. We have placed the jet location upstream of the counter-clockwise (CCW) vortex which was formed during the upstroke motion near the leading-edge; we have also considered several other locations nearby to perform sensitivity analysis. Our results showed that placing the jet slot within a very small range upstream of the CCW vortex had tremendous effects on both lift and drag, such that maximum drag was reduced by 80%. There was another unique observation: placing the jet at separation point led to an inverse behavior of drag hysteresis curve in upstroke and downstroke motions. Drag in downstroke motion was significantly lower than upstroke motion, whereas in uncontrolled case the converse was true. Lift was significantly enhanced during both upstroke and downstroke motions. By investigating the pressure coefficients, it was found that flow control had altered the distribution of pressure over the airfoil upper surface. It caused a reduction in pressure difference between upper and lower surfaces in the rear part, while substantially increased pressure difference in the front part of the airfoil.
    • Download: (2.373Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Active Flow Control of Dynamic Stall by Means of Continuous Jet Flow at Reynolds Number of 1 × 106

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251599
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTadjfar, Mehran
    contributor authorAsgari, Ehsan
    date accessioned2019-02-28T11:00:06Z
    date available2019-02-28T11:00:06Z
    date copyright10/4/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_140_01_011107.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251599
    description abstractWe have studied the influence of a tangential blowing jet in dynamic stall of a NACA0012 airfoil at Reynolds number of 1 × 106, for active flow control (AFC) purposes. The airfoil was oscillating between angles of attack (AOA) of 5 and 25 deg about its quarter-chord with a sinusoidal motion. We have utilized computational fluid dynamics to investigate the impact of jet location and jet velocity ratio on the aerodynamic coefficients. We have placed the jet location upstream of the counter-clockwise (CCW) vortex which was formed during the upstroke motion near the leading-edge; we have also considered several other locations nearby to perform sensitivity analysis. Our results showed that placing the jet slot within a very small range upstream of the CCW vortex had tremendous effects on both lift and drag, such that maximum drag was reduced by 80%. There was another unique observation: placing the jet at separation point led to an inverse behavior of drag hysteresis curve in upstroke and downstroke motions. Drag in downstroke motion was significantly lower than upstroke motion, whereas in uncontrolled case the converse was true. Lift was significantly enhanced during both upstroke and downstroke motions. By investigating the pressure coefficients, it was found that flow control had altered the distribution of pressure over the airfoil upper surface. It caused a reduction in pressure difference between upper and lower surfaces in the rear part, while substantially increased pressure difference in the front part of the airfoil.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleActive Flow Control of Dynamic Stall by Means of Continuous Jet Flow at Reynolds Number of 1 × 106
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4037841
    journal fristpage11107
    journal lastpage011107-10
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian