YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Hybrid Probabilistic–Possibilistic Treatment of Uncertainty in Building Energy Models: A Case Study of Sizing Peak Cooling Loads

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue:004::page 41008
    Author:
    Khayatian, Fazel
    ,
    MeshkinKiya, Maryam
    ,
    Baraldi, Piero
    ,
    Di Maio, Francesco
    ,
    Zio, Enrico
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4039784
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Optimal sizing of peak loads has proven to be an important factor affecting the overall energy consumption of heating ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. Uncertainty quantification of peak loads enables optimal configuration of the system by opting for a suitable size factor. However, the representation of uncertainty in HVAC sizing has been limited to probabilistic analysis and scenario-based cases, which may limit and bias the results. This study provides a framework for uncertainty representation in building energy modeling, due to both random factors and imprecise knowledge. The framework is shown by a numerical case study of sizing cooling loads, in which uncertain climatic data are represented by probability distributions and human-driven activities are described by possibility distributions. Cooling loads obtained from the hybrid probabilistic–possibilistic propagation of uncertainty are compared to those obtained by pure probabilistic and pure possibilistic approaches. Results indicate that a pure possibilistic representation may not provide detailed information on the peak cooling loads, whereas a pure probabilistic approach may underestimate the effect of uncertain human behavior. The proposed hybrid representation and propagation of uncertainty in this paper can overcome these issues by proper handling of both random and limited data.
    • Download: (1.996Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Hybrid Probabilistic–Possibilistic Treatment of Uncertainty in Building Energy Models: A Case Study of Sizing Peak Cooling Loads

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251198
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKhayatian, Fazel
    contributor authorMeshkinKiya, Maryam
    contributor authorBaraldi, Piero
    contributor authorDi Maio, Francesco
    contributor authorZio, Enrico
    date accessioned2019-02-28T10:57:43Z
    date available2019-02-28T10:57:43Z
    date copyright4/30/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn2332-9017
    identifier otherrisk_004_04_041008.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251198
    description abstractOptimal sizing of peak loads has proven to be an important factor affecting the overall energy consumption of heating ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. Uncertainty quantification of peak loads enables optimal configuration of the system by opting for a suitable size factor. However, the representation of uncertainty in HVAC sizing has been limited to probabilistic analysis and scenario-based cases, which may limit and bias the results. This study provides a framework for uncertainty representation in building energy modeling, due to both random factors and imprecise knowledge. The framework is shown by a numerical case study of sizing cooling loads, in which uncertain climatic data are represented by probability distributions and human-driven activities are described by possibility distributions. Cooling loads obtained from the hybrid probabilistic–possibilistic propagation of uncertainty are compared to those obtained by pure probabilistic and pure possibilistic approaches. Results indicate that a pure possibilistic representation may not provide detailed information on the peak cooling loads, whereas a pure probabilistic approach may underestimate the effect of uncertain human behavior. The proposed hybrid representation and propagation of uncertainty in this paper can overcome these issues by proper handling of both random and limited data.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleHybrid Probabilistic–Possibilistic Treatment of Uncertainty in Building Energy Models: A Case Study of Sizing Peak Cooling Loads
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume4
    journal issue4
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4039784
    journal fristpage41008
    journal lastpage041008-13
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue:004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian