Show simple item record

contributor authorChatzianagnostou, Dimitrios
contributor authorStaudacher, Stephan
date accessioned2019-02-28T10:57:03Z
date available2019-02-28T10:57:03Z
date copyright6/8/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier issn0742-4795
identifier othergtp_140_09_091702.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251093
description abstractComposite cycle engines comprising piston engines (PEs) as well as piston compressors (PCs) to achieve hecto pressure ratios represent a target area of current research surpassing gas turbine efficiency. An unclear broad range of design parameters is existing to describe the design space of piston machines for this type of engine architecture. Previously published work focuses on thermodynamic studies only partially considering limitations of the design space. To untie the problem of PE design, a dimensional analysis is carried out reducing the number of parameters and deriving two basic similarity relations. The first one is a function of the mean effective pressure as well as the operating mode and is a direct result from the thermodynamic cycle. The second one is constituted of the stroke-to-bore ratio and the ratio of effective power to piston surface. Similarity relations regarding the PC design are based on Grabow (1993, “Das erweiterte “Cordier”—Diagramm Für Fluidenergiemaschinen und Verbrennungsmotoren,” Forsch. Ingenieurwes., 59, pp. 42–50). A further correlation for PCs is based on the specific compression work and the piston speed. In Part I, data of existing PEs have been subjected to the above similarity parameters unveiling the state-of-the-art design space. This allows a first discussion of current technological constraints. Applying this result to the composite cycle engine gives the design space and a first classification as a low-speed engine. Investigating various design points in terms of number and displacement volume of cylinders confirms the engine speed classification. Part II will expand this investigation using preliminary design studies.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Piston Concept Design Solutions for Composite Cycle Engines—Part I: Similarity Considerations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4039704
journal fristpage91702
journal lastpage091702-9
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record