YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Production Forecasting for Shale Gas Reservoirs With Fast Marching-Succession of Steady States Method

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2018:;volume 140:;issue 003::page 32913
    Author:
    Teng, Bailu
    ,
    Cheng, Linsong
    ,
    Huang, Shijun
    ,
    Andy Li, Huazhou
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4038781
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this paper, we introduce fast marching-succession of steady-states (FM-SSS) method to predict gas production from shale gas formations. The solutions of fast marching method (FMM) will describe the dynamic drainage boundary, and the succession of steady-state (SSS) method is applied to predict the gas production within the drainage boundary. As only the grids within drainage need to be taken into calculation at each time-step, this approach works much more efficiently than the implicit finite difference method, especially, at the early stage of production when the drainage is relatively small.We combine FMM with SSS to conduct reservoir simulation and predict gas production in shale gas reservoirs. The pressure profiles of transient flow are approximated with the pressure profiles of steady-state flow in our approach. The difference between the proposed method and the conventional SSS method is that we provide an efficient method to characterize the boundary conditions. In the conventional SSS method, the boundary pressure has to be measured, which is inconvenient for simulation purposes, whereas FM-SSS method takes the dynamic drainage as a changing boundary and approximates the drainage boundary pressure with initial reservoir pressure, such that the boundary condition can be numerically characterized. A major advantage of our approach is that it is unconditionally stable and more efficient than the implicit finite difference method because much smaller-scale linear equations need to be solved at each time-step.
    • Download: (5.991Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Production Forecasting for Shale Gas Reservoirs With Fast Marching-Succession of Steady States Method

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250975
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTeng, Bailu
    contributor authorCheng, Linsong
    contributor authorHuang, Shijun
    contributor authorAndy Li, Huazhou
    date accessioned2019-02-28T10:56:17Z
    date available2019-02-28T10:56:17Z
    date copyright1/22/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherjert_140_03_032913.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250975
    description abstractIn this paper, we introduce fast marching-succession of steady-states (FM-SSS) method to predict gas production from shale gas formations. The solutions of fast marching method (FMM) will describe the dynamic drainage boundary, and the succession of steady-state (SSS) method is applied to predict the gas production within the drainage boundary. As only the grids within drainage need to be taken into calculation at each time-step, this approach works much more efficiently than the implicit finite difference method, especially, at the early stage of production when the drainage is relatively small.We combine FMM with SSS to conduct reservoir simulation and predict gas production in shale gas reservoirs. The pressure profiles of transient flow are approximated with the pressure profiles of steady-state flow in our approach. The difference between the proposed method and the conventional SSS method is that we provide an efficient method to characterize the boundary conditions. In the conventional SSS method, the boundary pressure has to be measured, which is inconvenient for simulation purposes, whereas FM-SSS method takes the dynamic drainage as a changing boundary and approximates the drainage boundary pressure with initial reservoir pressure, such that the boundary condition can be numerically characterized. A major advantage of our approach is that it is unconditionally stable and more efficient than the implicit finite difference method because much smaller-scale linear equations need to be solved at each time-step.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleProduction Forecasting for Shale Gas Reservoirs With Fast Marching-Succession of Steady States Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4038781
    journal fristpage32913
    journal lastpage032913-14
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2018:;volume 140:;issue 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian