Implementation of an Inverted Classroom in Structural Design CoursesSource: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 003Author:Gross Shawn P.;Musselman Eric S.
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000362Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The authors have used an inverted (flipped) classroom approach for the previous five years in upper level undergraduate courses in structural design (“Structural Steel and Reinforced Concrete”) at Villanova University. This paper briefly reviews the history of the courses and the motivation behind the decision to switch to the inverted format. It also presents details on the structure and the relationship of individual course components in the inverted model (recorded lecture videos, concept quizzes, problem sets, laboratory exercises, and examinations). The effectiveness of the inverted classroom and the various structures employed in its implementation are evaluated through the use of both student surveys and student performance on examinations. These clearly show that students favor the learning environment created by the inverted classroom format and student performance and problem solving ability improves in these classes. The inverted format also allows for a more rational treatment of Bloom’s taxonomy within the structure of the class.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Gross Shawn P.;Musselman Eric S. | |
| date accessioned | 2019-02-26T07:52:17Z | |
| date available | 2019-02-26T07:52:17Z | |
| date issued | 2018 | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29EI.1943-5541.0000362.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249963 | |
| description abstract | The authors have used an inverted (flipped) classroom approach for the previous five years in upper level undergraduate courses in structural design (“Structural Steel and Reinforced Concrete”) at Villanova University. This paper briefly reviews the history of the courses and the motivation behind the decision to switch to the inverted format. It also presents details on the structure and the relationship of individual course components in the inverted model (recorded lecture videos, concept quizzes, problem sets, laboratory exercises, and examinations). The effectiveness of the inverted classroom and the various structures employed in its implementation are evaluated through the use of both student surveys and student performance on examinations. These clearly show that students favor the learning environment created by the inverted classroom format and student performance and problem solving ability improves in these classes. The inverted format also allows for a more rational treatment of Bloom’s taxonomy within the structure of the class. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Implementation of an Inverted Classroom in Structural Design Courses | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 144 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000362 | |
| page | 5018003 | |
| tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |