Show simple item record

contributor authorGross Shawn P.;Musselman Eric S.
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:52:17Z
date available2019-02-26T07:52:17Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29EI.1943-5541.0000362.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249963
description abstractThe authors have used an inverted (flipped) classroom approach for the previous five years in upper level undergraduate courses in structural design (“Structural Steel and Reinforced Concrete”) at Villanova University. This paper briefly reviews the history of the courses and the motivation behind the decision to switch to the inverted format. It also presents details on the structure and the relationship of individual course components in the inverted model (recorded lecture videos, concept quizzes, problem sets, laboratory exercises, and examinations). The effectiveness of the inverted classroom and the various structures employed in its implementation are evaluated through the use of both student surveys and student performance on examinations. These clearly show that students favor the learning environment created by the inverted classroom format and student performance and problem solving ability improves in these classes. The inverted format also allows for a more rational treatment of Bloom’s taxonomy within the structure of the class.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleImplementation of an Inverted Classroom in Structural Design Courses
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000362
page5018003
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record