YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Modeling the Implementation Process for New Construction Technologies: Thematic Analysis Based on Australian and U.S. Practices

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Sepasgozar Samad M. E.;Davis Steven R.;Li Heng;Luo Xianrui
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000608
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: With the boom of innovative technologies, information technologies in construction are getting enough attention, whereas construction technology implementation remains an undiscovered area. This paper explores the process of construction technology implementation, including the main activities, assessment criteria, and the mechanism through which it influences future technology purchase decisions. To achieve this purpose, 98 experienced practitioners from Australia and the United States were interviewed, and the process used by customers during technology adoption decisions was extracted in the form of thematic analysis. This paper presents an original framework including the key subprocesses of technology implementation describing the activities of customers and vendors, including operation commencement, maintenance set up, and assessment. In addition, the findings show that customers assess the implementation based on assessment criteria, including down time, interpersonal relationship, and technology operation quality. Comparison between the United States and Australia showed that rapport with the vendor is more important in large markets, whereas lead time and disposal are more important in remote markets. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge by validating a framework that incorporates both customer and vendor activities into a unique framework of three subprocesses. As for manufacturers, they can increase their competitive advantage by ensuring that their equipment has minimized downtime through swift provision of spare parts and maintenance information.
    • Download: (546.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Modeling the Implementation Process for New Construction Technologies: Thematic Analysis Based on Australian and U.S. Practices

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249602
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSepasgozar Samad M. E.;Davis Steven R.;Li Heng;Luo Xianrui
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:04Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:49:04Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000608.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249602
    description abstractWith the boom of innovative technologies, information technologies in construction are getting enough attention, whereas construction technology implementation remains an undiscovered area. This paper explores the process of construction technology implementation, including the main activities, assessment criteria, and the mechanism through which it influences future technology purchase decisions. To achieve this purpose, 98 experienced practitioners from Australia and the United States were interviewed, and the process used by customers during technology adoption decisions was extracted in the form of thematic analysis. This paper presents an original framework including the key subprocesses of technology implementation describing the activities of customers and vendors, including operation commencement, maintenance set up, and assessment. In addition, the findings show that customers assess the implementation based on assessment criteria, including down time, interpersonal relationship, and technology operation quality. Comparison between the United States and Australia showed that rapport with the vendor is more important in large markets, whereas lead time and disposal are more important in remote markets. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge by validating a framework that incorporates both customer and vendor activities into a unique framework of three subprocesses. As for manufacturers, they can increase their competitive advantage by ensuring that their equipment has minimized downtime through swift provision of spare parts and maintenance information.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleModeling the Implementation Process for New Construction Technologies: Thematic Analysis Based on Australian and U.S. Practices
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000608
    page5018005
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian