Show simple item record

contributor authorSepasgozar Samad M. E.;Davis Steven R.;Li Heng;Luo Xianrui
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:04Z
date available2019-02-26T07:49:04Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000608.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249602
description abstractWith the boom of innovative technologies, information technologies in construction are getting enough attention, whereas construction technology implementation remains an undiscovered area. This paper explores the process of construction technology implementation, including the main activities, assessment criteria, and the mechanism through which it influences future technology purchase decisions. To achieve this purpose, 98 experienced practitioners from Australia and the United States were interviewed, and the process used by customers during technology adoption decisions was extracted in the form of thematic analysis. This paper presents an original framework including the key subprocesses of technology implementation describing the activities of customers and vendors, including operation commencement, maintenance set up, and assessment. In addition, the findings show that customers assess the implementation based on assessment criteria, including down time, interpersonal relationship, and technology operation quality. Comparison between the United States and Australia showed that rapport with the vendor is more important in large markets, whereas lead time and disposal are more important in remote markets. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge by validating a framework that incorporates both customer and vendor activities into a unique framework of three subprocesses. As for manufacturers, they can increase their competitive advantage by ensuring that their equipment has minimized downtime through swift provision of spare parts and maintenance information.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleModeling the Implementation Process for New Construction Technologies: Thematic Analysis Based on Australian and U.S. Practices
typeJournal Paper
journal volume34
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000608
page5018005
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record