YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Untitled

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2017:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 008::page 2353
    Author:
    Horváth, Ákos;Hautecoeur, Olivier;Borde, Régis;Deneke, Hartwig;Buehler, Stefan A.
    DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0059.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractThe European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) MetOp-A and MetOp-B satellites fly in the same polar orbit with a 180° phase difference, which enables the global retrieval of atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs, or ?winds?) by tracking clouds in a pair of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) infrared-window-channel images taken successively by the tandem platforms within their swath overlap area. This novel global wind product has been operational since 2015. As part of ongoing validation efforts, two months of MetOp global AMVs were compared with a suite of independent wind data, including AMVs from geostationary and polar-orbiter satellites as well as radiosonde and model winds. The performance of the new wind product is generally comparable to that of more established satellite winds. In the tropics, however, high-level MetOp global AMVs show a strong fast speed bias, increased root-mean-square difference, and considerably reduced speed correlation relative to all comparison datasets?an as-yet-unexplained drop in retrieval quality that warrants further investigation. A best-fit wind analysis also indicates that selectively applied height adjustments, such as cloud-base and inversion methods, can be a significant source of discrepancy, leading to very poor height correlation among low-level satellite AMVs. Height assignment is more consistent and better correlated at mid- to high levels, although MetOp heights derived from window-channel brightness temperatures have a bias toward lower heights because of the lack of semitransparency corrections. Collocated Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer CO2-slicing heights significantly improve the best-fit height-difference statistics at higher altitudes but are available for only ~5% of MetOp AMVs.
    • Download: (5.736Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246335
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHorváth, Ákos;Hautecoeur, Olivier;Borde, Régis;Deneke, Hartwig;Buehler, Stefan A.
    date accessioned2018-01-03T11:02:03Z
    date available2018-01-03T11:02:03Z
    date copyright7/10/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2017
    identifier otherjamc-d-17-0059.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246335
    description abstractAbstractThe European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) MetOp-A and MetOp-B satellites fly in the same polar orbit with a 180° phase difference, which enables the global retrieval of atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs, or ?winds?) by tracking clouds in a pair of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) infrared-window-channel images taken successively by the tandem platforms within their swath overlap area. This novel global wind product has been operational since 2015. As part of ongoing validation efforts, two months of MetOp global AMVs were compared with a suite of independent wind data, including AMVs from geostationary and polar-orbiter satellites as well as radiosonde and model winds. The performance of the new wind product is generally comparable to that of more established satellite winds. In the tropics, however, high-level MetOp global AMVs show a strong fast speed bias, increased root-mean-square difference, and considerably reduced speed correlation relative to all comparison datasets?an as-yet-unexplained drop in retrieval quality that warrants further investigation. A best-fit wind analysis also indicates that selectively applied height adjustments, such as cloud-base and inversion methods, can be a significant source of discrepancy, leading to very poor height correlation among low-level satellite AMVs. Height assignment is more consistent and better correlated at mid- to high levels, although MetOp heights derived from window-channel brightness temperatures have a bias toward lower heights because of the lack of semitransparency corrections. Collocated Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer CO2-slicing heights significantly improve the best-fit height-difference statistics at higher altitudes but are available for only ~5% of MetOp AMVs.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume56
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0059.1
    journal fristpage2353
    journal lastpage2376
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2017:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian