| contributor author | Mark D. Denavit | |
| contributor author | Jerome F. Hajjar | |
| contributor author | Tiziano Perea | |
| contributor author | Roberto T. Leon | |
| date accessioned | 2017-12-30T13:00:39Z | |
| date available | 2017-12-30T13:00:39Z | |
| date issued | 2016 | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001434.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244466 | |
| description abstract | The direct analysis method is the primary means of assessing system stability within a standard specification. This method, and in particular its use of reduced stiffness, has been thoroughly validated for use in frames consisting of structural steel members. However, appropriate stiffness reductions have not yet been established nor has the method as a whole been validated for frames with steel-concrete composite columns. Through comparisons between second-order inelastic analysis results and results from the design methodology on a parametric suite of small frames, the current design provisions are evaluated in this paper. The results indicate that while the current design provisions are safe and accurate for the majority of common cases, there exist cases in which the current provisions result in high levels of unconservative error. Modifications to the current design provisions are proposed to address these issues. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Stability Analysis and Design of Composite Structures | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 142 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001434 | |
| page | 04015157 | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |