Show simple item record

contributor authorMark D. Denavit
contributor authorJerome F. Hajjar
contributor authorTiziano Perea
contributor authorRoberto T. Leon
date accessioned2017-12-30T13:00:39Z
date available2017-12-30T13:00:39Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001434.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244466
description abstractThe direct analysis method is the primary means of assessing system stability within a standard specification. This method, and in particular its use of reduced stiffness, has been thoroughly validated for use in frames consisting of structural steel members. However, appropriate stiffness reductions have not yet been established nor has the method as a whole been validated for frames with steel-concrete composite columns. Through comparisons between second-order inelastic analysis results and results from the design methodology on a parametric suite of small frames, the current design provisions are evaluated in this paper. The results indicate that while the current design provisions are safe and accurate for the majority of common cases, there exist cases in which the current provisions result in high levels of unconservative error. Modifications to the current design provisions are proposed to address these issues.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStability Analysis and Design of Composite Structures
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001434
page04015157
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record