YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Asset Risk Management and Resilience for Flood Control, Hydropower, and Waterways

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Elizabeth B. Connelly
    ,
    Heimir Thorisson
    ,
    L. James Valverde
    ,
    James H. Lambert
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000862
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Natural disasters in the past decade have encouraged agencies responsible for development and maintenance of infrastructure systems toward the accounting of risk and resilience in asset management, buying down risks to economic, environmental, and social objectives. A principal aim of continuous asset risk management is the resilience of large-scale systems. This paper adopts and describes metrics and models for asset management. This paper implements priorities for three diverse classes of assets—waterway navigation, hydropower, and flood control—and identifies key challenges for risk and resilience analytics, including data quality, variability across business lines in interpretations of risk buydown, assumptions of project synergies and interactions, and evolving agency missions and organizational structures. The scale of the demonstration is thousands of assets, US$4 billion of needs, and US$2.3 billion of available funds. Attributes representing the objectives to minimize consequential damages are elicited and alternatives ranked by their potential threat to these objectives. The various sources of model and data uncertainty are characterized, and appropriate treatments of uncertainties related to risk and resilience are recommended.
    • Download: (192.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Asset Risk Management and Resilience for Flood Control, Hydropower, and Waterways

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244446
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorElizabeth B. Connelly
    contributor authorHeimir Thorisson
    contributor authorL. James Valverde
    contributor authorJames H. Lambert
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:00:33Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:00:33Z
    date issued2016
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0000862.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244446
    description abstractNatural disasters in the past decade have encouraged agencies responsible for development and maintenance of infrastructure systems toward the accounting of risk and resilience in asset management, buying down risks to economic, environmental, and social objectives. A principal aim of continuous asset risk management is the resilience of large-scale systems. This paper adopts and describes metrics and models for asset management. This paper implements priorities for three diverse classes of assets—waterway navigation, hydropower, and flood control—and identifies key challenges for risk and resilience analytics, including data quality, variability across business lines in interpretations of risk buydown, assumptions of project synergies and interactions, and evolving agency missions and organizational structures. The scale of the demonstration is thousands of assets, US$4 billion of needs, and US$2.3 billion of available funds. Attributes representing the objectives to minimize consequential damages are elicited and alternatives ranked by their potential threat to these objectives. The various sources of model and data uncertainty are characterized, and appropriate treatments of uncertainties related to risk and resilience are recommended.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAsset Risk Management and Resilience for Flood Control, Hydropower, and Waterways
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume2
    journal issue4
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0000862
    page04016001
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian