YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    David R. Groholski
    ,
    Youssef M. A. Hashash
    ,
    Byungmin Kim
    ,
    Michael Musgrove
    ,
    Joseph Harmon
    ,
    Jonathan P. Stewart
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001496
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Commonly used simplified one-dimensional nonlinear seismic site response analyses employ constitutive models based on a variation of the hyperbolic model to represent the initial stress-strain backbone curve. Desirable features of the backbone curve include provision of (1) an initial shear modulus at zero shear strain, (2) a limiting shear stress at large shear strains, and (3) flexible control of the nonlinear behavior between those boundary conditions. Available hyperbolic models have combinations of two of these features. A new general quadratic/hyperbolic (GQ/H) model is developed from the bivariate quadratic equation to provide all desired features. Nonlinear behavior is controlled by a shear-strain-dependent curve-fitting function. The model’s unload-reload rules and coupling with pore-water pressure generation are also presented. Several total-stress site response analyses are presented to demonstrate the performance of the GQ/H model relative to a commonly used hyperbolic model in which the maximum shear stress cannot be defined. The analyses show the importance of properly representing the maximum shear stress in the constitutive model because it may lead to underestimation or overestimation of the computed site response.
    • Download: (2.345Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239775
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDavid R. Groholski
    contributor authorYoussef M. A. Hashash
    contributor authorByungmin Kim
    contributor authorMichael Musgrove
    contributor authorJoseph Harmon
    contributor authorJonathan P. Stewart
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:11:40Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:11:40Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001496.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239775
    description abstractCommonly used simplified one-dimensional nonlinear seismic site response analyses employ constitutive models based on a variation of the hyperbolic model to represent the initial stress-strain backbone curve. Desirable features of the backbone curve include provision of (1) an initial shear modulus at zero shear strain, (2) a limiting shear stress at large shear strains, and (3) flexible control of the nonlinear behavior between those boundary conditions. Available hyperbolic models have combinations of two of these features. A new general quadratic/hyperbolic (GQ/H) model is developed from the bivariate quadratic equation to provide all desired features. Nonlinear behavior is controlled by a shear-strain-dependent curve-fitting function. The model’s unload-reload rules and coupling with pore-water pressure generation are also presented. Several total-stress site response analyses are presented to demonstrate the performance of the GQ/H model relative to a commonly used hyperbolic model in which the maximum shear stress cannot be defined. The analyses show the importance of properly representing the maximum shear stress in the constitutive model because it may lead to underestimation or overestimation of the computed site response.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSimplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001496
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian