YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Seismic Performance of Underground Reservoir Structures: Insight from Centrifuge Modeling on the Influence of Backfill Soil Type and Geometry

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    A. Hushmand
    ,
    S. Dashti
    ,
    C. Davis
    ,
    B. Hushmand
    ,
    J. S. McCartney
    ,
    J. Hu
    ,
    Y. Lee
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001544
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The seismic response of underground reservoir structures is a complex soil–structure interaction problem that depends on the properties of the earthquake motion, surrounding soil, and structure. More experimental and field data of the response of these structures under different boundary conditions are needed to validate analytical and numerical tools. This paper presents the results of four centrifuge experiments that investigate the seismic performance of reservoir structures, restrained from rotational movement at their roof and floor, buried in dry, medium-dense sand and compacted, partially saturated, silty sand. This study focuses on the influence of backfill soil properties, cover, and slope on accelerations, strains, lateral distortions, and lateral earth pressures experienced by the buried structure. The structure to far-field acceleration spectral ratios were observed to approach unity with added soil confinement, density, and stiffness. Both dynamic thrust and accelerations on the structure showed a peak near the effective fundamental frequency of the backfill soil. The addition of a shallow soil cover and stiffness slightly increased seismic earth pressures and moved their centroid upward, hence slightly amplifying seismic moments near the base. The added stiffness, density, and apparent cohesion of the compacted site-specific soil did not influence the magnitude of dynamic earth pressures significantly but often moved their centroid upward. A sloping backfill reduced the earth pressures and bending moments near the top of the wall because of the reduced soil mass. The trends in the experimental results indicate that new analytical procedures and design guidelines are needed to account for the backfill soil conditions and ground motions for which these underground structures must be designed.
    • Download: (915.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Seismic Performance of Underground Reservoir Structures: Insight from Centrifuge Modeling on the Influence of Backfill Soil Type and Geometry

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239724
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. Hushmand
    contributor authorS. Dashti
    contributor authorC. Davis
    contributor authorB. Hushmand
    contributor authorJ. S. McCartney
    contributor authorJ. Hu
    contributor authorY. Lee
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:11:26Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:11:26Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001544.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239724
    description abstractThe seismic response of underground reservoir structures is a complex soil–structure interaction problem that depends on the properties of the earthquake motion, surrounding soil, and structure. More experimental and field data of the response of these structures under different boundary conditions are needed to validate analytical and numerical tools. This paper presents the results of four centrifuge experiments that investigate the seismic performance of reservoir structures, restrained from rotational movement at their roof and floor, buried in dry, medium-dense sand and compacted, partially saturated, silty sand. This study focuses on the influence of backfill soil properties, cover, and slope on accelerations, strains, lateral distortions, and lateral earth pressures experienced by the buried structure. The structure to far-field acceleration spectral ratios were observed to approach unity with added soil confinement, density, and stiffness. Both dynamic thrust and accelerations on the structure showed a peak near the effective fundamental frequency of the backfill soil. The addition of a shallow soil cover and stiffness slightly increased seismic earth pressures and moved their centroid upward, hence slightly amplifying seismic moments near the base. The added stiffness, density, and apparent cohesion of the compacted site-specific soil did not influence the magnitude of dynamic earth pressures significantly but often moved their centroid upward. A sloping backfill reduced the earth pressures and bending moments near the top of the wall because of the reduced soil mass. The trends in the experimental results indicate that new analytical procedures and design guidelines are needed to account for the backfill soil conditions and ground motions for which these underground structures must be designed.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSeismic Performance of Underground Reservoir Structures: Insight from Centrifuge Modeling on the Influence of Backfill Soil Type and Geometry
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001544
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian