YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Lateral Spread Displacement and Bridge Foundation Case Histories from the 1991 Magnitude 7.6 Earthquake near Limón, Costa Rica

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Kevin W. Franke
    ,
    Kyle M. Rollins
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001653
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper presents four liquefaction and pile response case histories associated with highway bridges from the April 22, 1991 7.6 magnitude (M) earthquake near Limón, Costa Rica that were analyzed more than 20 years after the earthquake. Details regarding observed soil layering, measured soil properties, site geometries, structural details, and damage are presented. Back-analysis of lateral spread displacements, liquefaction triggering, and kinematic pile response are performed to assess methods and models commonly applied in modern engineering design. Results of the liquefaction and lateral spread back-analysis show that conventional empirical methods for estimating lateral spread displacements can yield reasonable displacement predictions if multiple models are used and averaged. Empirical models tend to underestimate displacements in cases where considerable fines were encountered in the liquefiable soil. Simplified Newmark-type slope displacement models significantly underpredict the ground displacements observed at the bridge abutments of the four case histories. Results of the kinematic pile response back-analysis demonstrate that simplified conventional superpile methods closely replicate the observed pile response from the four case studies, particularly when using a simplified hybrid p-y model for the liquefied soil. Additional important lessons regarding the resilience of damaged infrastructure, the contribution of the bridge deck in the kinematic loading of piles, and the importance of considering void-ratio redistribution and the potential development of water films in kinematic pile response are discussed.
    • Download: (1.738Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Lateral Spread Displacement and Bridge Foundation Case Histories from the 1991 Magnitude 7.6 Earthquake near Limón, Costa Rica

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239604
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKevin W. Franke
    contributor authorKyle M. Rollins
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:10:48Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:10:48Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001653.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239604
    description abstractThis paper presents four liquefaction and pile response case histories associated with highway bridges from the April 22, 1991 7.6 magnitude (M) earthquake near Limón, Costa Rica that were analyzed more than 20 years after the earthquake. Details regarding observed soil layering, measured soil properties, site geometries, structural details, and damage are presented. Back-analysis of lateral spread displacements, liquefaction triggering, and kinematic pile response are performed to assess methods and models commonly applied in modern engineering design. Results of the liquefaction and lateral spread back-analysis show that conventional empirical methods for estimating lateral spread displacements can yield reasonable displacement predictions if multiple models are used and averaged. Empirical models tend to underestimate displacements in cases where considerable fines were encountered in the liquefiable soil. Simplified Newmark-type slope displacement models significantly underpredict the ground displacements observed at the bridge abutments of the four case histories. Results of the kinematic pile response back-analysis demonstrate that simplified conventional superpile methods closely replicate the observed pile response from the four case studies, particularly when using a simplified hybrid p-y model for the liquefied soil. Additional important lessons regarding the resilience of damaged infrastructure, the contribution of the bridge deck in the kinematic loading of piles, and the importance of considering void-ratio redistribution and the potential development of water films in kinematic pile response are discussed.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLateral Spread Displacement and Bridge Foundation Case Histories from the 1991 Magnitude 7.6 Earthquake near Limón, Costa Rica
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001653
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian