YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Deterministic and Probabilistic Assessment of Liquefaction Hazards Using the Liquefaction Potential Index and Liquefaction Reduction Number

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Jaewon Chung
    ,
    J. David Rogers
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001772
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The liquefaction potential index (LPI) has increasingly been used for assessing liquefaction hazards induced by earthquake shaking. The LPI allows an integral number of soil horizons to be evaluated for liquefaction potential. Considerable uncertainty exists in cases where the LPI thresholds for classifying liquefaction hazards statistically rely on the data sets and/or the framework. This study explored what the appropriate LPI classification thresholds should be and developed a liquefaction reduction number (RL) to better account for the impact of nonliquefiable layers. The LPI and RL values were then analyzed at the standard penetration test (SPT) data sites reported in case studies. The results suggested that most SPT-based LPI thresholds should be modified upward in comparison with Iwasaki’s original scale. These corrections are of particular importance when clay minerals are part of the soil mixture, rather than simply using the minus 200-sieve fraction as the liquefaction susceptibility criterion. Nonliquefied sites appear to exhibit higher RL values, suggesting that the RL could supplement the LPI as a valuable proxy for liquefaction hazard assessments. Probabilistic liquefaction hazard assessments could be estimated using a logistic regression of the LPI and/or RL values.
    • Download: (845.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Deterministic and Probabilistic Assessment of Liquefaction Hazards Using the Liquefaction Potential Index and Liquefaction Reduction Number

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239478
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJaewon Chung
    contributor authorJ. David Rogers
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:10:17Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:10:17Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001772.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239478
    description abstractThe liquefaction potential index (LPI) has increasingly been used for assessing liquefaction hazards induced by earthquake shaking. The LPI allows an integral number of soil horizons to be evaluated for liquefaction potential. Considerable uncertainty exists in cases where the LPI thresholds for classifying liquefaction hazards statistically rely on the data sets and/or the framework. This study explored what the appropriate LPI classification thresholds should be and developed a liquefaction reduction number (RL) to better account for the impact of nonliquefiable layers. The LPI and RL values were then analyzed at the standard penetration test (SPT) data sites reported in case studies. The results suggested that most SPT-based LPI thresholds should be modified upward in comparison with Iwasaki’s original scale. These corrections are of particular importance when clay minerals are part of the soil mixture, rather than simply using the minus 200-sieve fraction as the liquefaction susceptibility criterion. Nonliquefied sites appear to exhibit higher RL values, suggesting that the RL could supplement the LPI as a valuable proxy for liquefaction hazard assessments. Probabilistic liquefaction hazard assessments could be estimated using a logistic regression of the LPI and/or RL values.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDeterministic and Probabilistic Assessment of Liquefaction Hazards Using the Liquefaction Potential Index and Liquefaction Reduction Number
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001772
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian