YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Probable Maximum Loss for the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model: Comparison

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Sneh Gulati
    ,
    Florence George
    ,
    B. M. Golam Kibria
    ,
    Shahid Hamid
    ,
    Steve Cocke
    ,
    Jean-Paul Pinelli
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000913
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Hurricanes are a way of life in South Florida, where owning a home without windstorm insurance is almost an impossibility. Insurance premiums for windstorm loses are computed through the use of complex mathematical models called catastrophe (cat) models. When they were first developed, cat models focused on the calculation of average annual loss due to wind. However, with exposure increasing rapidly along the coast of South Florida, it is imperative for insurance companies to protect themselves from the “once-in-100-year event”; in other words, probable maximum loss (PML). Gulati et al. (2014) investigated the computation and distribution of probable maximum loss in the case of personal residential structures for version 5.0 of the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model using parametric and nonparametric methods. Here, the authors investigate the computation of probable maximum insured losses for personal and commercial residential buildings in version 6.1 of the model using the same methods. The authors also compare how PML values for total insured loss have changed between the two versions.
    • Download: (632.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Probable Maximum Loss for the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model: Comparison

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239297
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSneh Gulati
    contributor authorFlorence George
    contributor authorB. M. Golam Kibria
    contributor authorShahid Hamid
    contributor authorSteve Cocke
    contributor authorJean-Paul Pinelli
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:09:20Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:09:20Z
    date issued2017
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0000913.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239297
    description abstractHurricanes are a way of life in South Florida, where owning a home without windstorm insurance is almost an impossibility. Insurance premiums for windstorm loses are computed through the use of complex mathematical models called catastrophe (cat) models. When they were first developed, cat models focused on the calculation of average annual loss due to wind. However, with exposure increasing rapidly along the coast of South Florida, it is imperative for insurance companies to protect themselves from the “once-in-100-year event”; in other words, probable maximum loss (PML). Gulati et al. (2014) investigated the computation and distribution of probable maximum loss in the case of personal residential structures for version 5.0 of the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model using parametric and nonparametric methods. Here, the authors investigate the computation of probable maximum insured losses for personal and commercial residential buildings in version 6.1 of the model using the same methods. The authors also compare how PML values for total insured loss have changed between the two versions.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleProbable Maximum Loss for the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model: Comparison
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue4
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0000913
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian