Identifying Uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing ModelsSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 011::page 114502DOI: 10.1115/1.4034103Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: As additive manufacturing (AM) matures, models are beginning to take a more prominent stage in design and process planning. A limitation frequently encountered in AM models is a lack of indication about their precision and accuracy. Often overlooked, model uncertainty is required for validation of AM models, qualification of AM-produced parts, and uncertainty management. This paper presents a discussion on the origin and propagation of uncertainty in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) models. Four sources of uncertainty are identified: modeling assumptions, unknown simulation parameters, numerical approximations, and measurement error in calibration data. Techniques to quantify uncertainty in each source are presented briefly, along with estimation algorithms to diminish prediction uncertainty with the incorporation of online measurements. The methods are illustrated with a case study based on a thermal model designed for melt pool width predictions. Model uncertainty is quantified for single track experiments, and the effect of online estimation in overhanging structures is studied via simulation.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Lopez, Felipe | |
contributor author | Witherell, Paul | |
contributor author | Lane, Brandon | |
date accessioned | 2017-11-25T07:17:58Z | |
date available | 2017-11-25T07:17:58Z | |
date copyright | 2016/09/12 | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
identifier other | md_138_11_114502.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4234882 | |
description abstract | As additive manufacturing (AM) matures, models are beginning to take a more prominent stage in design and process planning. A limitation frequently encountered in AM models is a lack of indication about their precision and accuracy. Often overlooked, model uncertainty is required for validation of AM models, qualification of AM-produced parts, and uncertainty management. This paper presents a discussion on the origin and propagation of uncertainty in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) models. Four sources of uncertainty are identified: modeling assumptions, unknown simulation parameters, numerical approximations, and measurement error in calibration data. Techniques to quantify uncertainty in each source are presented briefly, along with estimation algorithms to diminish prediction uncertainty with the incorporation of online measurements. The methods are illustrated with a case study based on a thermal model designed for melt pool width predictions. Model uncertainty is quantified for single track experiments, and the effect of online estimation in overhanging structures is studied via simulation. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Identifying Uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Models | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 138 | |
journal issue | 11 | |
journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4034103 | |
journal fristpage | 114502 | |
journal lastpage | 114502-4 | |
tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 011 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |