YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of the Performance of Quasi-Optimal and Conventional Objective Analysis Schemes

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1973:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 007::page 1093
    Author:
    Petersen, Daniel P.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1973)012<1093:ACOTPO>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Verification error covariance statistics for operational 12-hr prognoses of 300-mb heights and winds have been obtained. Based on these statistical data, optimal weightings on height and wind observations at a typical distribution of upper air observing stations have been derived and the indicated error of the resulting objective analysis calculated. For comparison, the weightings implied by the conventional (NMC) analysis scheme were determined and evaluated by means of the same statistics.
    • Download: (614.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of the Performance of Quasi-Optimal and Conventional Objective Analysis Schemes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4229922
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPetersen, Daniel P.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:30:13Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:30:13Z
    date copyright1973/10/01
    date issued1973
    identifier issn0021-8952
    identifier otherams-8637.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229922
    description abstractVerification error covariance statistics for operational 12-hr prognoses of 300-mb heights and winds have been obtained. Based on these statistical data, optimal weightings on height and wind observations at a typical distribution of upper air observing stations have been derived and the indicated error of the resulting objective analysis calculated. For comparison, the weightings implied by the conventional (NMC) analysis scheme were determined and evaluated by means of the same statistics.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Comparison of the Performance of Quasi-Optimal and Conventional Objective Analysis Schemes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1973)012<1093:ACOTPO>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1093
    journal lastpage1101
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1973:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian