Intercomparison of Arctic Regional Climate Models: Modeling Clouds and Radiation for SHEBA in May 1998Source: Journal of Climate:;2006:;volume( 019 ):;issue: 017::page 4167DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3854.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: To improve simulations of the Arctic climate and to quantify climate model errors, four regional climate models [the Arctic Regional Climate System Model (ARCSYM), the Coupled Ocean?Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS), the High-Resolution Limited-Area Model (HIRHAM), and the Rossby Center Atmospheric Model (RCA)] have simulated the annual Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) under the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ARCMIP). The same lateral boundary and ocean surface boundary conditions (i.e., ice concentration and surface temperature) drive all of the models. This study evaluated modeled surface heat fluxes and cloud fields during May 1998, a month that included the onset of the surface icemelt. In general, observations agreed with simulated surface pressure and near-surface air properties. Simulation errors due to surface fluxes and cloud effects biased the net simulated surface heat flux, which in turn affected the timing of the simulated icemelt. Modeled cloud geometry and precipitation suggest that the RCA model produced the most accurate cloud scheme, followed by the HIRHAM model. Evaluation of a relationship between cloud water paths and radiation showed that a radiative transfer scheme in ARCSYM was closely matched with the observation when liquid clouds were dominant. Clouds and radiation are of course closely linked, and an additional comparison of the radiative transfer codes for ARCSYM and COAMPS was performed for clear-sky conditions, thereby excluding cloud effects. Overall, the schemes for radiative transfer in ARCSYM and for cloud microphysics in RCA potentially have some advantages for modeling the springtime Arctic.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Inoue, Jun | |
contributor author | Liu, Jiping | |
contributor author | Pinto, James O. | |
contributor author | Curry, Judith A. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:02:13Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:02:13Z | |
date copyright | 2006/09/01 | |
date issued | 2006 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-78320.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220976 | |
description abstract | To improve simulations of the Arctic climate and to quantify climate model errors, four regional climate models [the Arctic Regional Climate System Model (ARCSYM), the Coupled Ocean?Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS), the High-Resolution Limited-Area Model (HIRHAM), and the Rossby Center Atmospheric Model (RCA)] have simulated the annual Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) under the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ARCMIP). The same lateral boundary and ocean surface boundary conditions (i.e., ice concentration and surface temperature) drive all of the models. This study evaluated modeled surface heat fluxes and cloud fields during May 1998, a month that included the onset of the surface icemelt. In general, observations agreed with simulated surface pressure and near-surface air properties. Simulation errors due to surface fluxes and cloud effects biased the net simulated surface heat flux, which in turn affected the timing of the simulated icemelt. Modeled cloud geometry and precipitation suggest that the RCA model produced the most accurate cloud scheme, followed by the HIRHAM model. Evaluation of a relationship between cloud water paths and radiation showed that a radiative transfer scheme in ARCSYM was closely matched with the observation when liquid clouds were dominant. Clouds and radiation are of course closely linked, and an additional comparison of the radiative transfer codes for ARCSYM and COAMPS was performed for clear-sky conditions, thereby excluding cloud effects. Overall, the schemes for radiative transfer in ARCSYM and for cloud microphysics in RCA potentially have some advantages for modeling the springtime Arctic. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Intercomparison of Arctic Regional Climate Models: Modeling Clouds and Radiation for SHEBA in May 1998 | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 19 | |
journal issue | 17 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI3854.1 | |
journal fristpage | 4167 | |
journal lastpage | 4178 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2006:;volume( 019 ):;issue: 017 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |