Show simple item record

contributor authorInoue, Jun
contributor authorLiu, Jiping
contributor authorPinto, James O.
contributor authorCurry, Judith A.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:02:13Z
date available2017-06-09T17:02:13Z
date copyright2006/09/01
date issued2006
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-78320.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220976
description abstractTo improve simulations of the Arctic climate and to quantify climate model errors, four regional climate models [the Arctic Regional Climate System Model (ARCSYM), the Coupled Ocean?Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS), the High-Resolution Limited-Area Model (HIRHAM), and the Rossby Center Atmospheric Model (RCA)] have simulated the annual Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) under the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ARCMIP). The same lateral boundary and ocean surface boundary conditions (i.e., ice concentration and surface temperature) drive all of the models. This study evaluated modeled surface heat fluxes and cloud fields during May 1998, a month that included the onset of the surface icemelt. In general, observations agreed with simulated surface pressure and near-surface air properties. Simulation errors due to surface fluxes and cloud effects biased the net simulated surface heat flux, which in turn affected the timing of the simulated icemelt. Modeled cloud geometry and precipitation suggest that the RCA model produced the most accurate cloud scheme, followed by the HIRHAM model. Evaluation of a relationship between cloud water paths and radiation showed that a radiative transfer scheme in ARCSYM was closely matched with the observation when liquid clouds were dominant. Clouds and radiation are of course closely linked, and an additional comparison of the radiative transfer codes for ARCSYM and COAMPS was performed for clear-sky conditions, thereby excluding cloud effects. Overall, the schemes for radiative transfer in ARCSYM and for cloud microphysics in RCA potentially have some advantages for modeling the springtime Arctic.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleIntercomparison of Arctic Regional Climate Models: Modeling Clouds and Radiation for SHEBA in May 1998
typeJournal Paper
journal volume19
journal issue17
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI3854.1
journal fristpage4167
journal lastpage4178
treeJournal of Climate:;2006:;volume( 019 ):;issue: 017
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record