Did the ECMWF Seasonal Forecast Model Outperform Statistical ENSO Forecast Models over the Last 15 Years?Source: Journal of Climate:;2005:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 016::page 3240Author:Jan van Oldenborgh, Geert
,
Balmaseda, Magdalena A.
,
Ferranti, Laura
,
Stockdale, Timothy N.
,
Anderson, David L. T.
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3420.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) has made seasonal forecasts since 1997 with ensembles of a coupled ocean?atmosphere model, System-1 (S1). In January 2002, a new version, System-2 (S2), was introduced. For the calibration of these models, hindcasts have been performed starting in 1987, so that 15 yr of hindcasts and forecasts are now available for verification. Seasonal predictability is to a large extent due to the El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climate oscillations. ENSO predictions of the ECMWF models are compared with those of statistical models, some of which are used operationally. The relative skill depends strongly on the season. The dynamical models are better at forecasting the onset of El Niño or La Niña in boreal spring to summer. The statistical models are comparable at predicting the evolution of an event in boreal fall and winter.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Jan van Oldenborgh, Geert | |
contributor author | Balmaseda, Magdalena A. | |
contributor author | Ferranti, Laura | |
contributor author | Stockdale, Timothy N. | |
contributor author | Anderson, David L. T. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:00:45Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:00:45Z | |
date copyright | 2005/08/01 | |
date issued | 2005 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-77898.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220506 | |
description abstract | The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) has made seasonal forecasts since 1997 with ensembles of a coupled ocean?atmosphere model, System-1 (S1). In January 2002, a new version, System-2 (S2), was introduced. For the calibration of these models, hindcasts have been performed starting in 1987, so that 15 yr of hindcasts and forecasts are now available for verification. Seasonal predictability is to a large extent due to the El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climate oscillations. ENSO predictions of the ECMWF models are compared with those of statistical models, some of which are used operationally. The relative skill depends strongly on the season. The dynamical models are better at forecasting the onset of El Niño or La Niña in boreal spring to summer. The statistical models are comparable at predicting the evolution of an event in boreal fall and winter. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Did the ECMWF Seasonal Forecast Model Outperform Statistical ENSO Forecast Models over the Last 15 Years? | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 18 | |
journal issue | 16 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI3420.1 | |
journal fristpage | 3240 | |
journal lastpage | 3249 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2005:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 016 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |