Show simple item record

contributor authorJan van Oldenborgh, Geert
contributor authorBalmaseda, Magdalena A.
contributor authorFerranti, Laura
contributor authorStockdale, Timothy N.
contributor authorAnderson, David L. T.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:00:45Z
date available2017-06-09T17:00:45Z
date copyright2005/08/01
date issued2005
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-77898.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220506
description abstractThe European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) has made seasonal forecasts since 1997 with ensembles of a coupled ocean?atmosphere model, System-1 (S1). In January 2002, a new version, System-2 (S2), was introduced. For the calibration of these models, hindcasts have been performed starting in 1987, so that 15 yr of hindcasts and forecasts are now available for verification. Seasonal predictability is to a large extent due to the El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climate oscillations. ENSO predictions of the ECMWF models are compared with those of statistical models, some of which are used operationally. The relative skill depends strongly on the season. The dynamical models are better at forecasting the onset of El Niño or La Niña in boreal spring to summer. The statistical models are comparable at predicting the evolution of an event in boreal fall and winter.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleDid the ECMWF Seasonal Forecast Model Outperform Statistical ENSO Forecast Models over the Last 15 Years?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue16
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI3420.1
journal fristpage3240
journal lastpage3249
treeJournal of Climate:;2005:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 016
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record