YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluating Four Remote Sensing Methods for Estimating Surface Air Temperature on a Regional Scale

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2016:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 003::page 803
    Author:
    Liu, Suhua
    ,
    Su, Hongbo
    ,
    Tian, Jing
    ,
    Zhang, Renhua
    ,
    Wang, Weizhen
    ,
    Wu, Yueru
    DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0188.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: urface air temperature is a basic meteorological variable to monitor the environment and assess climate change. Four remote sensing methods?the temperature?vegetation index (TVX), the univariate linear regression method, the multivariate linear regression method, and the advection-energy balance for surface air temperature (ADEBAT)?have been developed to acquire surface air temperature on a regional scale. To evaluate their utilities, they were applied to estimate the surface air temperature in northwestern China and were compared with each other through regressive analyses, t tests, estimation errors, and analyses on estimations of different underlying surfaces. Results can be summarized into three aspects: 1) The regressive analyses and t tests indicate that the multivariate linear regression method and the ADEBAT provide better accuracy than the other two methods. 2) Frequency histograms on estimation errors show that the multivariate linear regression method produces the minimum error range, and the univariate linear regression method produces the maximum error range. Errors of the multivariate linear regression method exhibit a nearly normal distribution and that of the ADEBAT exhibit a bimodal distribution, whereas the other two methods display negative skewness distributions. 3) Estimates on different underlying surfaces show that the TVX and the univariate linear regression method are significantly limited in regions with sparse vegetation cover. The multivariate linear regression method has estimation errors within 1°C and without high levels of errors, and the ADEBAT also produces high estimation errors on bare ground.
    • Download: (637.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluating Four Remote Sensing Methods for Estimating Surface Air Temperature on a Regional Scale

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4217720
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLiu, Suhua
    contributor authorSu, Hongbo
    contributor authorTian, Jing
    contributor authorZhang, Renhua
    contributor authorWang, Weizhen
    contributor authorWu, Yueru
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:51:28Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:51:28Z
    date copyright2017/03/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-75390.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217720
    description abstracturface air temperature is a basic meteorological variable to monitor the environment and assess climate change. Four remote sensing methods?the temperature?vegetation index (TVX), the univariate linear regression method, the multivariate linear regression method, and the advection-energy balance for surface air temperature (ADEBAT)?have been developed to acquire surface air temperature on a regional scale. To evaluate their utilities, they were applied to estimate the surface air temperature in northwestern China and were compared with each other through regressive analyses, t tests, estimation errors, and analyses on estimations of different underlying surfaces. Results can be summarized into three aspects: 1) The regressive analyses and t tests indicate that the multivariate linear regression method and the ADEBAT provide better accuracy than the other two methods. 2) Frequency histograms on estimation errors show that the multivariate linear regression method produces the minimum error range, and the univariate linear regression method produces the maximum error range. Errors of the multivariate linear regression method exhibit a nearly normal distribution and that of the ADEBAT exhibit a bimodal distribution, whereas the other two methods display negative skewness distributions. 3) Estimates on different underlying surfaces show that the TVX and the univariate linear regression method are significantly limited in regions with sparse vegetation cover. The multivariate linear regression method has estimation errors within 1°C and without high levels of errors, and the ADEBAT also produces high estimation errors on bare ground.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluating Four Remote Sensing Methods for Estimating Surface Air Temperature on a Regional Scale
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume56
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0188.1
    journal fristpage803
    journal lastpage814
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2016:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian