Simulation of Airborne Transport and Dispersion for Urban Waterside ReleasesSource: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2016:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 001::page 27Author:Meir, Talmor
,
Pullen, Julie
,
Blumberg, Alan F.
,
Holt, Teddy R.
,
Bieringer, Paul E.
,
Bieberbach, George
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0025.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: esults are presented from a tracer-release modeling study designed to examine atmospheric transport and dispersion (?T&D?) behavior surrounding the complex coastal?urban region of New York City, New York, where air?sea interaction and urban influences are prominent. The puff-based Hazard Prediction Assessment Capability (HPAC, version 5) model is run for idealized conditions, and it is also linked with the urbanized COAMPS (1 km) meteorological model and the NAM (12 km) meteorological model. Results are compared with ?control? plumes utilizing surface meteorological input from 22 weather stations. In all configurations, nighttime conditions result in plume predictions that are more sensitive to small changes in wind direction. Plume overlap is reduced by up to 70% when plumes are transported during the night. An analysis of vertical plume cross sections and the nature of the underlying transport and the dispersion equations both suggest that heat flux gradients and boundary layer height gradients determine vertical transport of pollutants across land?sea boundaries in the T&D model. As a consequence, in both idealized and realistic meteorological configurations, waterfront releases generate greater plume discrepancies relative to plumes transported over land/urban surfaces. For transport over water (northwest winds), the higher-fidelity meteorological model (COAMPS) generated plumes with overlap reduced by about one-half when compared with that of the coarser-resolution NAM model (13% vs 24% during the daytime and 11% vs 18% during the nighttime). This study highlights the need for more sophisticated treatment of land?sea transition zones in T&D calculations covering waterside releases.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Meir, Talmor | |
contributor author | Pullen, Julie | |
contributor author | Blumberg, Alan F. | |
contributor author | Holt, Teddy R. | |
contributor author | Bieringer, Paul E. | |
contributor author | Bieberbach, George | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:51:14Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:51:14Z | |
date copyright | 2017/01/01 | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier issn | 1558-8424 | |
identifier other | ams-75324.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217648 | |
description abstract | esults are presented from a tracer-release modeling study designed to examine atmospheric transport and dispersion (?T&D?) behavior surrounding the complex coastal?urban region of New York City, New York, where air?sea interaction and urban influences are prominent. The puff-based Hazard Prediction Assessment Capability (HPAC, version 5) model is run for idealized conditions, and it is also linked with the urbanized COAMPS (1 km) meteorological model and the NAM (12 km) meteorological model. Results are compared with ?control? plumes utilizing surface meteorological input from 22 weather stations. In all configurations, nighttime conditions result in plume predictions that are more sensitive to small changes in wind direction. Plume overlap is reduced by up to 70% when plumes are transported during the night. An analysis of vertical plume cross sections and the nature of the underlying transport and the dispersion equations both suggest that heat flux gradients and boundary layer height gradients determine vertical transport of pollutants across land?sea boundaries in the T&D model. As a consequence, in both idealized and realistic meteorological configurations, waterfront releases generate greater plume discrepancies relative to plumes transported over land/urban surfaces. For transport over water (northwest winds), the higher-fidelity meteorological model (COAMPS) generated plumes with overlap reduced by about one-half when compared with that of the coarser-resolution NAM model (13% vs 24% during the daytime and 11% vs 18% during the nighttime). This study highlights the need for more sophisticated treatment of land?sea transition zones in T&D calculations covering waterside releases. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Simulation of Airborne Transport and Dispersion for Urban Waterside Releases | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 56 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0025.1 | |
journal fristpage | 27 | |
journal lastpage | 44 | |
tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2016:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |