YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    One-Way Coupling of the WRF–QUIC Urban Dispersion Modeling System

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2015:;volume( 054 ):;issue: 010::page 2119
    Author:
    Kochanski, A. K.
    ,
    Pardyjak, E. R.
    ,
    Stoll, R.
    ,
    Gowardhan, A.
    ,
    Brown, M. J.
    ,
    Steenburgh, W. J.
    DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0020.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: imulations of local weather and air quality in urban areas must account for processes spanning from meso- to microscales, including turbulence and transport within the urban canopy layer. Here, the authors investigate the performance of the building-resolving Quick Urban Industrial Complex (QUIC) Dispersion Modeling System driven with mean wind profiles from the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Dispersion simulations are performed for intensive observation periods 2 and 8 of the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment conducted in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, using an ensemble of expert-derived wind profiles from observational data as well as profiles derived from WRF runs. The results suggest that WRF can be used successfully as a source of inflow boundary conditions for urban simulations, without the collection and processing of intensive field observations needed to produce expert-derived wind profiles. Detailed statistical analysis of tracer concentration fields suggests that, for the purpose of the urban dispersion, WRF simulations provide wind forcing as good as individual or ensemble expert-derived profiles. Despite problems capturing the strength and the elevation of the Great Plains low-level jet, the WRF-simulated near-surface wind speed and direction were close to observations, thus assuring realistic forcing for urban dispersion estimates. Tests performed with multilayer and bulk urban parameterizations embedded in WRF did not provide any conclusive evidence of the superiority of one scheme over the other, although the dispersion simulations driven by the latter showed slightly better results.
    • Download: (4.612Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      One-Way Coupling of the WRF–QUIC Urban Dispersion Modeling System

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4217488
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKochanski, A. K.
    contributor authorPardyjak, E. R.
    contributor authorStoll, R.
    contributor authorGowardhan, A.
    contributor authorBrown, M. J.
    contributor authorSteenburgh, W. J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:50:45Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:50:45Z
    date copyright2015/10/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-75181.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217488
    description abstractimulations of local weather and air quality in urban areas must account for processes spanning from meso- to microscales, including turbulence and transport within the urban canopy layer. Here, the authors investigate the performance of the building-resolving Quick Urban Industrial Complex (QUIC) Dispersion Modeling System driven with mean wind profiles from the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Dispersion simulations are performed for intensive observation periods 2 and 8 of the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment conducted in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, using an ensemble of expert-derived wind profiles from observational data as well as profiles derived from WRF runs. The results suggest that WRF can be used successfully as a source of inflow boundary conditions for urban simulations, without the collection and processing of intensive field observations needed to produce expert-derived wind profiles. Detailed statistical analysis of tracer concentration fields suggests that, for the purpose of the urban dispersion, WRF simulations provide wind forcing as good as individual or ensemble expert-derived profiles. Despite problems capturing the strength and the elevation of the Great Plains low-level jet, the WRF-simulated near-surface wind speed and direction were close to observations, thus assuring realistic forcing for urban dispersion estimates. Tests performed with multilayer and bulk urban parameterizations embedded in WRF did not provide any conclusive evidence of the superiority of one scheme over the other, although the dispersion simulations driven by the latter showed slightly better results.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleOne-Way Coupling of the WRF–QUIC Urban Dispersion Modeling System
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume54
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0020.1
    journal fristpage2119
    journal lastpage2139
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2015:;volume( 054 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian