Backscatter Differential Phase—Estimation and VariabilitySource: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2013:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 011::page 2529Author:Trömel, Silke
,
Kumjian, Matthew R.
,
Ryzhkov, Alexander V.
,
Simmer, Clemens
,
Diederich, Malte
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0124.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: n the basis of simulations and observations made with polarimetric radars operating at X, C, and S bands, the backscatter differential phase δ has been explored; δ has been identified as an important polarimetric variable that should not be ignored in precipitation estimations that are based on specific differential phase KDP, especially at shorter radar wavelengths. Moreover, δ bears important information about the dominant size of raindrops and wet snowflakes in the melting layer. New methods for estimating δ in rain and in the melting layer are suggested. The method for estimating δ in rain is based on a modified version of the ?ZPHI? algorithm and provides reasonably robust estimates of δ and KDP in pure rain except in regions where the total measured differential phase ΦDP behaves erratically, such as areas affected by nonuniform beam filling or low signal-to-noise ratio. The method for estimating δ in the melting layer results in reliable estimates of δ in stratiform precipitation and requires azimuthal averaging of radial profiles of ΦDP at high antenna elevations. Comparisons with large disdrometer datasets collected in Oklahoma and Germany confirm a strong interdependence between δ and differential reflectivity ZDR. Because δ is immune to attenuation, partial beam blockage, and radar miscalibration, the strong correlation between ZDR and δ is of interest for quantitative precipitation estimation: δ and ZDR are differently affected by the particle size distribution (PSD) and thus may complement each other for PSD moment estimation. Furthermore, the magnitude of δ can be utilized as an important calibration parameter for improving microphysical models of the melting layer.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Trömel, Silke | |
| contributor author | Kumjian, Matthew R. | |
| contributor author | Ryzhkov, Alexander V. | |
| contributor author | Simmer, Clemens | |
| contributor author | Diederich, Malte | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:49:44Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T16:49:44Z | |
| date copyright | 2013/11/01 | |
| date issued | 2013 | |
| identifier issn | 1558-8424 | |
| identifier other | ams-74868.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217140 | |
| description abstract | n the basis of simulations and observations made with polarimetric radars operating at X, C, and S bands, the backscatter differential phase δ has been explored; δ has been identified as an important polarimetric variable that should not be ignored in precipitation estimations that are based on specific differential phase KDP, especially at shorter radar wavelengths. Moreover, δ bears important information about the dominant size of raindrops and wet snowflakes in the melting layer. New methods for estimating δ in rain and in the melting layer are suggested. The method for estimating δ in rain is based on a modified version of the ?ZPHI? algorithm and provides reasonably robust estimates of δ and KDP in pure rain except in regions where the total measured differential phase ΦDP behaves erratically, such as areas affected by nonuniform beam filling or low signal-to-noise ratio. The method for estimating δ in the melting layer results in reliable estimates of δ in stratiform precipitation and requires azimuthal averaging of radial profiles of ΦDP at high antenna elevations. Comparisons with large disdrometer datasets collected in Oklahoma and Germany confirm a strong interdependence between δ and differential reflectivity ZDR. Because δ is immune to attenuation, partial beam blockage, and radar miscalibration, the strong correlation between ZDR and δ is of interest for quantitative precipitation estimation: δ and ZDR are differently affected by the particle size distribution (PSD) and thus may complement each other for PSD moment estimation. Furthermore, the magnitude of δ can be utilized as an important calibration parameter for improving microphysical models of the melting layer. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Backscatter Differential Phase—Estimation and Variability | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 52 | |
| journal issue | 11 | |
| journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0124.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 2529 | |
| journal lastpage | 2548 | |
| tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2013:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 011 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |