YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rain Rate and Water Content in Hurricanes Compared with Summer Rain in Miami, Florida

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2012:;volume( 051 ):;issue: 012::page 2218
    Author:
    Black, Robert A.
    ,
    Hallett, John
    DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0144.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: iquid water content (g m?3), precipitation rate (mm h?1), and radar reflectivity (dBZ) are inferred from cross sections of particle images obtained by aircraft. Each dataset is presented in a probability format to display changing functional relationships for the selected intervals. The probability of intercepting a given quantity during a flight provides guidance in required instrument sensitivity together with the frequency of precipitation and liquid water content events for given rainfall totals. These data are compared with surface rain rate obtained over two years in the May?October warm seasons in Miami, Florida, with a Hotplate rain gauge. The warm season Miami surface rain-rate probability distribution is similar to the 2005 hurricane rain-rate distribution. Rain rates > ~120 mm h?1 were responsible for over one-half of the accumulation, even though lighter rain dominated by time. Hurricane rainfall is somewhat more intense than the normal surface convective rainfall in that 10% of the 1977?2001 (old) hurricane rain rates exceeded 20 mm h?1, whereas only 10% of the surface rain rates exceeded only ~10 mm h?1. The shape of the rain-rate probability distributions from the 2005 (recent) hurricane data was nearly identical to the probability distribution of rain rates in the Miami data. The radar reflectivity distributions were similar, whose 90% level was about 45 dBZ for the old storms and about 35 dBZ for the 2005 storms. These data clearly show the low bias of the 2005 hurricane data caused by the systematic avoidance of heavy precipitation.
    • Download: (4.412Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rain Rate and Water Content in Hurricanes Compared with Summer Rain in Miami, Florida

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4216783
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBlack, Robert A.
    contributor authorHallett, John
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:48:38Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:48:38Z
    date copyright2012/12/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-74546.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216783
    description abstractiquid water content (g m?3), precipitation rate (mm h?1), and radar reflectivity (dBZ) are inferred from cross sections of particle images obtained by aircraft. Each dataset is presented in a probability format to display changing functional relationships for the selected intervals. The probability of intercepting a given quantity during a flight provides guidance in required instrument sensitivity together with the frequency of precipitation and liquid water content events for given rainfall totals. These data are compared with surface rain rate obtained over two years in the May?October warm seasons in Miami, Florida, with a Hotplate rain gauge. The warm season Miami surface rain-rate probability distribution is similar to the 2005 hurricane rain-rate distribution. Rain rates > ~120 mm h?1 were responsible for over one-half of the accumulation, even though lighter rain dominated by time. Hurricane rainfall is somewhat more intense than the normal surface convective rainfall in that 10% of the 1977?2001 (old) hurricane rain rates exceeded 20 mm h?1, whereas only 10% of the surface rain rates exceeded only ~10 mm h?1. The shape of the rain-rate probability distributions from the 2005 (recent) hurricane data was nearly identical to the probability distribution of rain rates in the Miami data. The radar reflectivity distributions were similar, whose 90% level was about 45 dBZ for the old storms and about 35 dBZ for the 2005 storms. These data clearly show the low bias of the 2005 hurricane data caused by the systematic avoidance of heavy precipitation.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleRain Rate and Water Content in Hurricanes Compared with Summer Rain in Miami, Florida
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume51
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0144.1
    journal fristpage2218
    journal lastpage2235
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2012:;volume( 051 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian