YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Continuous Soil Moisture Simulations Using Different Soil Hydraulic Parameterizations for a Site in Germany

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2007:;volume( 046 ):;issue: 008::page 1275
    Author:
    Schädler, Gerd
    DOI: 10.1175/JAM2528.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Continuous time series of soil water content over a period of more than 9 months for a midlatitude sandy loam soil covered by grass are calculated with the Campbell and the van Genuchten soil hydraulic functions and the Clapp?Hornberger, Cosby et al., and Rawls?Brakensiek parameter sets. The results are compared with soil water content observed at several soil depths, and the water balance components are evaluated. The Campbell soil hydraulic functions are often used by meteorologists, whereas the van Genuchten functions are widespread among hydrologists. The simulations are performed with the ?VEG3D? soil?vegetation model in stand-alone mode forced by on-site meteorological observations. The soil water content and meteorological observations were obtained within the Regional Climate Project (REKLIP) at a site in the Rhine valley in southern Germany with 10-min temporal resolution. Apart from the different soil hydraulic functions and parameter sets, the effects of different lower boundary conditions and initializations on the simulations are compared in terms of statistical quantities like mean error, bias, correlation coefficient, and least squares fit. Large differences between the various combinations are found. For the situation considered in this paper, the van Genuchten?Clapp?Hornberger, the Campbell?Cosby et al., and the van Genuchten?Rawls?Brakensiek combinations give the best overall agreement with the observations.
    • Download: (2.084Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Continuous Soil Moisture Simulations Using Different Soil Hydraulic Parameterizations for a Site in Germany

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4216683
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSchädler, Gerd
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:48:19Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:48:19Z
    date copyright2007/08/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-74456.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216683
    description abstractContinuous time series of soil water content over a period of more than 9 months for a midlatitude sandy loam soil covered by grass are calculated with the Campbell and the van Genuchten soil hydraulic functions and the Clapp?Hornberger, Cosby et al., and Rawls?Brakensiek parameter sets. The results are compared with soil water content observed at several soil depths, and the water balance components are evaluated. The Campbell soil hydraulic functions are often used by meteorologists, whereas the van Genuchten functions are widespread among hydrologists. The simulations are performed with the ?VEG3D? soil?vegetation model in stand-alone mode forced by on-site meteorological observations. The soil water content and meteorological observations were obtained within the Regional Climate Project (REKLIP) at a site in the Rhine valley in southern Germany with 10-min temporal resolution. Apart from the different soil hydraulic functions and parameter sets, the effects of different lower boundary conditions and initializations on the simulations are compared in terms of statistical quantities like mean error, bias, correlation coefficient, and least squares fit. Large differences between the various combinations are found. For the situation considered in this paper, the van Genuchten?Clapp?Hornberger, the Campbell?Cosby et al., and the van Genuchten?Rawls?Brakensiek combinations give the best overall agreement with the observations.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Comparison of Continuous Soil Moisture Simulations Using Different Soil Hydraulic Parameterizations for a Site in Germany
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume46
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/JAM2528.1
    journal fristpage1275
    journal lastpage1289
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2007:;volume( 046 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian