Understanding the Influence of Climate Forecasts on Farmer Decisions as Planned BehaviorSource: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2006:;volume( 045 ):;issue: 009::page 1202Author:Artikov, Ikrom
,
Hoffman, Stacey J.
,
Lynne, Gary D.
,
Zillig, Lisa M. Pytlik
,
Hu, Qi
,
Tomkins, Alan J.
,
Hubbard, Kenneth G.
,
Hayes, Michael J.
,
Waltman, William
DOI: 10.1175/JAM2415.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Results of a set of four regression models applied to recent survey data of farmers in eastern Nebraska suggest the causes that drive farmer intentions of using weather and climate information and forecasts in farming decisions. The model results quantify the relative importance of attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control, and financial capability in explaining the influence of climate-conditions information and short-term and long-term forecasts on agronomic, crop insurance, and crop marketing decisions. Attitude, serving as a proxy for the utility gained from the use of such information, had the most profound positive influence on the outcome of all the decisions, followed by norms. The norms in the community, as a proxy for the utility gained from allowing oneself to be influenced by others, played a larger role in agronomic decisions than in insurance or marketing decisions. In addition, the interaction of controllability (accuracy, availability, reliability, timeliness of weather and climate information), self-efficacy (farmer ability and understanding), and general preference for control was shown to be a substantive cause. Yet control variables also have an economic side: The farm-sales variable as a measure of financial ability and motivation intensified and clarified the role of control while also enhancing the statistical robustness of the attitude and norms variables in better clarifying how they drive the influence. Overall, the integrated model of planned behavior from social psychology and derived demand from economics, that is, the ?planned demand model,? is more powerful than models based on either of these approaches alone. Taken together, these results suggest that the ?human dimension? needs to be better recognized so as to improve effective use of climate and weather forecasts and information for farming decision making.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Artikov, Ikrom | |
contributor author | Hoffman, Stacey J. | |
contributor author | Lynne, Gary D. | |
contributor author | Zillig, Lisa M. Pytlik | |
contributor author | Hu, Qi | |
contributor author | Tomkins, Alan J. | |
contributor author | Hubbard, Kenneth G. | |
contributor author | Hayes, Michael J. | |
contributor author | Waltman, William | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:48:01Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:48:01Z | |
date copyright | 2006/09/01 | |
date issued | 2006 | |
identifier issn | 1558-8424 | |
identifier other | ams-74348.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216563 | |
description abstract | Results of a set of four regression models applied to recent survey data of farmers in eastern Nebraska suggest the causes that drive farmer intentions of using weather and climate information and forecasts in farming decisions. The model results quantify the relative importance of attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control, and financial capability in explaining the influence of climate-conditions information and short-term and long-term forecasts on agronomic, crop insurance, and crop marketing decisions. Attitude, serving as a proxy for the utility gained from the use of such information, had the most profound positive influence on the outcome of all the decisions, followed by norms. The norms in the community, as a proxy for the utility gained from allowing oneself to be influenced by others, played a larger role in agronomic decisions than in insurance or marketing decisions. In addition, the interaction of controllability (accuracy, availability, reliability, timeliness of weather and climate information), self-efficacy (farmer ability and understanding), and general preference for control was shown to be a substantive cause. Yet control variables also have an economic side: The farm-sales variable as a measure of financial ability and motivation intensified and clarified the role of control while also enhancing the statistical robustness of the attitude and norms variables in better clarifying how they drive the influence. Overall, the integrated model of planned behavior from social psychology and derived demand from economics, that is, the ?planned demand model,? is more powerful than models based on either of these approaches alone. Taken together, these results suggest that the ?human dimension? needs to be better recognized so as to improve effective use of climate and weather forecasts and information for farming decision making. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Understanding the Influence of Climate Forecasts on Farmer Decisions as Planned Behavior | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 45 | |
journal issue | 9 | |
journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JAM2415.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1202 | |
journal lastpage | 1214 | |
tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2006:;volume( 045 ):;issue: 009 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |